Are Some Atomic Orbitals From a 4D Wave Function?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the visualization of electron orbitals as standing waves, necessitating a four-dimensional representation of wave functions against three spatial dimensions (x, y, z). It explains that wave functions in the N=2 family exist in a four-dimensional Hilbert space, where the dimensionality arises from the degeneracy of eigenstates in hydrogenic atoms. To accurately depict a three-dimensional function like the electron density, a fourth dimension is required to represent density at each point in space. This concept is not unique to wave functions but applies broadly to any three-dimensional function. The need for alternative visualization techniques, such as shading, is emphasized to convey this complexity effectively.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,619
Reaction score
2,982
"To visualize the standing waves (or orbitals) of electrons bound to a positively charged nucleus in three dimensions, we will need a four-dimensional plot of the wave function vs. x, y, and z."
http://www.grandinetti.org/electron-orbital-shapes"The wavefunctions in the N=2 family are vectors in an abstract four-dimensional space. This can also be called a function-space and/or a Hilbert space." http://www.av8n.com/physics/wavefunctions.htm

So, what are those dimensions and wave functions? This must be fairly basic.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what the author means by "four-dimensional plot of the wave function vs. x, y, and z" in the first link. For the second link, the author has specifically considered the n=2 subspace of a hydrogenic atoms where the eigenstates are 4-fold degenerate (one in 2s and three in 2p), therefore the subspace of n=2 has a dimensionality of 4.
 
For the first link, it goes like this. If you want to represent a one-dimensional function f(x), you need to produce a two-dimensional plot. Likewise, a two-dimensional function f(x,y) will require a 3D plot. So to plot ##| \psi(x,y,z) |^2##, you would need to be in a 4D world, the 4th dimension representing the density at point (x,y,z). That's why you need other visualization techniques, such as shading. It has nothing to do with the wave function per se, but is true of any 3D function f(x,y,z).
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
DrClaude said:
For the first link, it goes like this. If you want to represent a one-dimensional function f(x), you need to produce a two-dimensional plot. Likewise, a two-dimensional function f(x,y) will require a 3D plot. So to plot ##| \psi(x,y,z) |^2##, you would need to be in a 4D world, the 4th dimension representing the density at point (x,y,z). That's why you need other visualization techniques, such as shading. It has nothing to do with the wave function per se, but is true of any 3D function f(x,y,z).
Aha. Simple enough. Thanks!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K