Empty space in atoms vs orbits

In summary, empty space in atoms refers to the vast amount of space between the nucleus and the electrons that surround it. This empty space makes up the majority of an atom's volume and is necessary for the electrons to move freely and maintain their energy levels. On the other hand, orbits are the specific paths that electrons follow around the nucleus, based on their energy levels. While the concept of empty space in atoms may seem counterintuitive, it is crucial for the structure and behavior of atoms. Orbits, on the other hand, play a significant role in determining an atom's properties and interactions with other atoms. Overall, both empty space and orbits are essential components of the structure of atoms and contribute to their unique characteristics.
  • #1
skepticwulf
74
1
We often read that atoms are mostly empty space. A common example is given as, if the atom was a big as a football stadium the nucleus would be as big as a tennis ball on the center and nearest electrons circling around at far side of seats or something like that.
How does this reconcile with the fact that first orbit of electron is "s" and it has a shape of sphere; the electron occupying a "s" orbit can be anywhere in this orbit determined by quantum mechanics? The orbit is actually an probability function of where you might find an electron if you want to calculate it.
If nucleus is so small surrounded by "s" orbit, how can we say that nearest electrons are far far away?
Doe it mean electrons mostly occupy outer shell of this sphere? rarely traveling close to nucleus?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
no..electron do come closer to nucleas but its quatam physics don't allow us to put permennant place that we can find it...we can find them on sphere as you said..there are diffrent types of spheres according to their shap S is circular...further you can study by do some google my friend...
 
  • #3
skepticwulf said:
Doe it mean electrons mostly occupy outer shell of this sphere? rarely traveling close to nucleus?

Particles in QM don't actually have a position until its observed to have a position. Those orbital diagrams give the probability of finding it in that position if you were to observe it.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #4
Can we then safely assume the picture is false? there's no huge space between nucleus and first orbit of electrons but electrons can be anywhere in that particular s orbit filling the sphere?
The reason I'm focusing on s orbits is s being the closest to the nucleus and is most relevant with stadium analogy.
 
  • #5
skepticwulf said:
We often read that atoms are mostly empty space. A common example is given as, if the atom was a big as a football stadium the nucleus would be as big as a tennis ball on the center and nearest electrons circling around at far side of seats or something like that.

This kind of image is used in connection with the Bohr model with its circular orbits, which has been obsolete for ninety years or more. Banish it from your mind.
 
  • Like
Likes Imager and PWiz
  • #6
jtbell said:
This kind of image is used in connection with the Bohr model with its circular orbits, which has been obsolete for ninety years or more. Banish it from your mind.

:) ok
 
  • #7
The thing is that in the standard model all elementary particles (including electrons) are assumed to be point like, and as such have no spatial dimension. So it doesn't really make much sense to ask how much of space in an atom is not occupied by electrons, because electrons do not themselves have any volume.
 
  • #8
one thing can travel at certain distance, at "d", from nucleus regardless of its volume. it can not?
my question is, inside a s orbit, do electron prefer designated areas more to the other like closer to shell rather than center OR do they distribute themlseves equally all the volume of sphere "s"? If latter is correct, than stadium analogy should be totally false as there's no such thing as empty space between nucleus and first 1s or 2s electrons. They can be anywhere in "s"
 
  • #9
skepticwulf said:
one thing can travel at certain distance, at "d", from nucleus regardless of its volume. it can not?
Motion is not so easy to understand on the quantum level. You have to make an observation (an interaction) on the electron to determine to its position, but this inevitably affects its momentum, and hence its motion. Besides, in an atom electrons are just standing waves in bound states, so the idea of motion doesn't seem all that useful. AFAIK, the expectation value for momentum is always 0 in a stationary state.

I'm not aware of the details, but for n=1 (the H atom), Schrodinger's wave equation solution gives us a probability density function that only depends on the radial distance from the nucleus. So yes, the probability of finding an electron will vary within the s orbital (of an H atom).
 
Last edited:
  • #10
skepticwulf said:
do electron prefer designated areas more to the other like closer to shell rather than center OR do they distribute themlseves equally all the volume of sphere "s"?

Neither, in general. See Figure 3-4 on the following page, for the ground state of hydrogen:

http://www.chemistry.mcmaster.ca/esam/Chapter_3/section_2.html

Warning: You often see plots of the "radial probability density" which goes to zero as the distance from the center goes to zero, like this:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydr.html

This is something different from the first link. The quantity plotted in the first link is the probability per unit volume, whereas the second link shows the probability per unit distance from the center (nucleus). They're different because, crudely speaking, (probability per radial distance) = (probability per volume at that distance) * (number of points at that distance). As the distance from the center increases/decreases, so does the number of points at that distance. Think of the area of a sphere, 4πr2. There are fewer points with small r than with large r, and only one point with r = 0.

[Added] Another way to think of the difference: the first graph is (loosely speaking) the probability of the electron being located at a single point with the specified distance from the center, whereas the second graph is the probability of the electron being located anywhere on a spherical shell with the specified radius.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
skepticwulf said:
one thing can travel at certain distance, at "d", from nucleus regardless of its volume. it can not?

The picture of a quantum particle traveling at a certain distance is false. QM is a theory about the results of observations. When not observed you can't say it has any property like traveling at a certain distance.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #12
jtbell said:
Neither, in general. See Figure 3-4 on the following page, for the ground state of hydrogen:

http://www.chemistry.mcmaster.ca/esam/Chapter_3/section_2.html

Warning: You often see plots of the "radial probability density" which goes to zero as the distance from the center goes to zero, like this:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/hydr.html

This is something different from the first link. The quantity plotted in the first link is the probability per unit volume, whereas the second link shows the probability per unit distance from the center (nucleus). They're different because, crudely speaking, (probability per radial distance) = (probability per volume at that distance) * (number of points at that distance). As the distance from the center increases/decreases, so does the number of points at that distance. Think of the area of a sphere, 4πr2. There are fewer points with small r than with large r, and only one point with r = 0.

[Added] Another way to think of the difference: the first graph is (loosely speaking) the probability of the electron being located at a single point with the specified distance from the center, whereas the second graph is the probability of the electron being located anywhere on a spherical shell with the specified radius.
Thank you, it was comprehensive.
 

FAQ: Empty space in atoms vs orbits

What is empty space in atoms?

Empty space in atoms refers to the regions within an atom where there are no electrons or other particles present. These regions are often referred to as "empty" because they do not contain any matter, but they still contain energy and play a crucial role in the behavior and properties of atoms.

What is the difference between empty space in atoms and orbits?

The main difference between empty space in atoms and orbits is that empty space refers to the areas within an atom where there are no particles, while orbits refer to the specific paths that electrons follow around the nucleus of an atom. Empty space is present in all atoms, while orbits only apply to atoms with multiple electrons.

How much of an atom is empty space?

The amount of empty space in an atom can vary depending on the specific atom and its electron configuration. However, on average, it is estimated that about 99.9999999999999% of an atom's volume is empty space. This means that the vast majority of an atom's volume is made up of empty space.

Why is empty space important in atoms?

Empty space in atoms is crucial because it allows for the movement and interactions of electrons within the atom. Without this space, electrons would not be able to occupy different energy levels and interact with other atoms, which is essential for the formation of chemical bonds and the creation of matter as we know it.

Can empty space be manipulated?

While empty space itself cannot be manipulated, scientists have been able to manipulate the behavior of particles within that space, such as electrons. This has led to advancements in technology such as transistors and computer chips, which rely on the precise manipulation of electrons within empty space to function.

Similar threads

Replies
23
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top