in particular, i wonder if the trasposition super operator is basis independent or not.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

We can always write an operator W as

[itex]\hat{W}=\sum_{i,j} c_{i,j} |i\rangle\langle j| [/itex]

and for the transposed we obtain

[itex]\hat{W}^T=\sum_{i,j} c_{j,i} |i\rangle\langle j| [/itex]

we obtain a relation true for each \psi,\phi

[itex]\langle\psi|\hat{W}^T|\phi\rangle=\langle\phi|\hat{W}|\psi\rangle [/itex] (1)

Now let's write the transposition super-operator as

[itex]\Lambda[\hat{W}]=\sum_{i,j} |i\rangle\langle j| \hat{W} |i\rangle\langle j| = \hat{W}^T[/itex]

Now seems that thetransposed matrixdoesnot dependfrom thebasis,

I have to admit it because the formula (1) is true for each vector and don't depend from the basis.

But that's sound strange to me, because if I have an operator, it can always be diagonal in a certain basis, and so it is equal to its transposition.

We can always write W diagonal in a certain basis [itex]\{|\tilde{k}>\}[/itex] not neccesary equal to [itex]\{|i>\}[/itex]:

[itex]

\hat{W}=\sum_{k} c_k |\tilde{k}\rangle\langle\tilde{k}|[/itex]

and from here do i get

[itex]

\hat{W}^T=(\sum_{k} c_k |\tilde{k}\rangle\langle\tilde{k}|)^T=(\sum_{k} c_k |\tilde{k}\rangle\langle\tilde{k}|=\hat{W}[/itex]

Where i'm wrong?

Can I write every super operator in a representation that is independent from the basis?

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Are super-operators always writable in a basis independent form?

Can you offer guidance or do you also need help?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**