Are there any almost irrational numbers that have deceived mathematicians?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter guysensei1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Numbers
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the concept of numbers that may appear irrational but are actually rational upon deeper examination. It highlights that while some numbers, like the Euler-Mascheroni constant, are conjectured to be irrational, their rationality remains unproven. The conversation also addresses the idea of numbers that mathematicians initially believed to be irrational, such as the square root of 2, which was later proven to be rational. The discussion emphasizes the importance of rigorous proof over superficial decimal representation in determining a number's rationality.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational and irrational numbers
  • Familiarity with mathematical proofs and conjectures
  • Knowledge of the Euler-Mascheroni constant
  • Basic comprehension of decimal expansions and periodic sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the proof of the irrationality of the square root of 2
  • Investigate the properties and conjectures surrounding the Euler-Mascheroni constant
  • Explore the concept of "almost-integers" and their significance in mathematics
  • Learn about the history of irrational numbers and their proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of mathematics, and anyone interested in the properties of numbers and the history of mathematical proofs.

guysensei1
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Does any known rational number look irrational at first glance but when calculated to 100s or 1000s of digits actually resolve into a repeating sequence? Have they deceived mathematicians?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "look irrational"? Obviously, there exist a number whose decimal expansion is identical to \pi for the first, say, 10 million decimal places, then is just "5"s after that. That is a rational number. Would you say it "looks irrational"?
 
I think what he means, is there a number which appears irrational, but then after a couple hundred or thousand digits it repeats, meaning it isn't actually irrational.

For example if after 14trillion digits ##\pi## "resets" and started ##14159...## again. Which of course it doesn't but this is what the OP means I think.
 
Last edited:
What I meant to say was:

Are there any numbers that mathematicians thought were irrational for some time then was proven rational? And as an expansion, what about the converse?
 
guysensei1 said:
Does any known rational number look irrational at first glance but when calculated to 100s or 1000s of digits actually resolve into a repeating sequence? Have they deceived mathematicians?

We don't look at the decimal representation of a number to decide if it is rational or not, we prove that there are no integers a and b such that a/b is equal to the number.

For example: http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/math/q1.html
 
I think guysensei1 is thinking about numbers that aren't artificially constructed for the purpose of "looking" irrational (like the example with pi's first 10^6 digits followed by 5's), but rather for 'natural' examples, where a given number was conjectured to be irrational by most mathematicians until someone proved it was in fact rational.

The Euler-Mascheroni constant is believed to be irrational, but no one has managed to prove this yet. If it turns out to be rational, this would be a perfect example. In any case, I believe a whole bunch of digits have been computed without any periodic pattern revealed yet.

A trivial example of the converse would be the square root of 2, since before the proof that it was irrational, Greek mathematicians believed every length could be expressed in terms of integer ratios. You could also look up "almost-integer", which give a lot of examples for numbers that are very close to integers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_integer

and another relevant link: http://xkcd.com/1047/
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K