Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the presence and nature of research in engineering compared to other fields such as physics and mathematics. Participants explore the availability of engineering journals, the types of research conducted by engineers, and the pressures faced by academic versus industry engineers regarding publication.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- Some participants suggest that there may be fewer engineering journals compared to those in mathematics and physics, questioning the reasons behind this perception.
- Others point out that professional organizations like IEEE, ACM, and AIAA publish numerous journals but are protective of their copyrights, making it inappropriate to submit articles to platforms like arxiv.org.
- There is a belief among some that the volume of engineering research is substantial, potentially exceeding that of physics, due to the higher number of engineering professionals.
- Participants discuss the existence of specialized engineering journals and the challenges of accessing them, often suggesting libraries as a resource.
- Some mention that much engineering research remains unpublished, particularly in industry, where proprietary information and patent issues limit dissemination.
- There is a debate about the pressure to publish faced by academic engineers compared to their industry counterparts, with some asserting that academic engineers do experience significant pressure to publish.
- Questions arise regarding the differences in research objectives between academic engineers and those in industry, particularly concerning the proprietary nature of corporate research.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the number of engineering journals compared to those in other fields, the pressure to publish, and the nature of research conducted in academia versus industry. No consensus is reached on these points.
Contextual Notes
Participants note that the discussion is influenced by assumptions about the nature of engineering research, the role of patents, and the proprietary nature of industry work, which may not be universally applicable.