Are These Statements About Preimages Correct and Complete?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmari
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on the correctness of various statements regarding preimages in set theory, specifically for a function \( f: M \rightarrow N \) and subsets \( A, B \subset N \). The statements evaluated include \( f^{-1}(A \cup B) = f^{-1}(A) \cup f^{-1}(B) \), \( f^{-1}(\overline{A}) = \overline{f^{-1}(A)} \), and \( f^{-1}(A \setminus B) = f^{-1}(A) \setminus f^{-1}(B) \). The participants confirm the validity of these statements and discuss the implications of \( A \subseteq B \) on the preimages, concluding that the implication does not hold universally. The discussion emphasizes the importance of precise language in mathematical proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of functions and mappings in set theory
  • Familiarity with the concept of preimages
  • Knowledge of set operations such as union, intersection, and complement
  • Basic proficiency in logical implications and proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of preimages in more complex functions
  • Explore the implications of set inclusion on preimages in various contexts
  • Learn about the relationship between functions and their inverses in set theory
  • Investigate examples where preimage properties hold or fail
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in set theory and its applications in functional analysis.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $f:M\rightarrow N$, $A,B\subset N$. I want to check if the following statements about the preimages are correct:
  1. $f^{-1}(A\cup B)=f^{-1}(A)\cup f^{-1}(B)$
  2. $f^{-1}(\overline{A})=\overline{f^{-1}(A)}$
  3. $f^{-1}(A\setminus B)=f^{-1}(A)\setminus f^{-1}(B)$
  4. $A\cap B=\emptyset \Rightarrow f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)=\emptyset$
  5. $A\subseteq B \Rightarrow f^{-1}(B)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$
I have done the following:

  1. Let $x\in f^{-1}(A\cup B)$. Then it follows that $f(x)\in A\cup B$. This means that either $f(x)\in A$ or $f(x)\in B$, so $x\in f^{-1}(A)$ or $x\in f^{-1}(B)$. It follows that $x\in f^{-1}(A)\cup f^{-1}(B)$.

    We have shown that $\displaystyle{f^{-1}(A\cup B)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)\cup f^{-1}(B)}$. Let $x\in f^{-1}(A)\cup f^{-1}(B)$. Then we either have that $x\in f^{-1}(A)$ or $x\in f^{-1}(B)$, so either $f(x)\in A$ or $f(x)\in B$. This means that $f(x)\in A\cup B$. It follows that $x\in f^{-1}(A\cup B)$.

    We have shown that $\displaystyle{f^{-1}(A)\cup f^{-1}(B) \subseteq f^{-1}(A\cup B)}$. From these two inclusions it follows that $\displaystyle{f^{-1}(A\cup B)=f^{-1}(A)\cup f^{-1}(B)}$.

    $$$$
  2. $$x\in f^{-1}(\overline{A}) \iff f(x) \in \overline{A} \iff f(x) \notin A \iff x\notin f^{-1}(A) \iff x\in \overline{f^{-1}(A)}$$
    Therefore, we get that $f^{-1}(\overline{A})=\overline{f^{-1}(A)}$.

    $$$$
  3. $$x\in f^{-1}(A\setminus B) \iff f(x)\in A\setminus B \iff f(x) \in A \text{ AND } f(x) \notin B \iff x\in f^{-1}(A) \text{ AND } x\notin f^{-1}(B) \\ \iff x\in f^{-1}(A)\setminus f^{-1}(B)$$
    Therefore, we get that $f^{-1}(A\setminus B)=f^{-1}(A)\setminus f^{-1}(B)$.

    $$$$
  4. We suppose that $f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)\neq\emptyset$. That means that $\exists x\in f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)$. That means that $x\in f^{-1}(A)$ AND $x\in f^{-1}(B)$. That implies that $f(x)\in A$ AND $f(x)\in B$, and so $f(x)\in A\cap B$. We get a contradiction since $A\cap B=\emptyset$.
    So, that what we supposed at the beginning was wrong, i.e., $f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)\neq\emptyset$ is not correct. So, it must be $f^{-1}(A)\cap f^{-1}(B)=\emptyset$.
Is everything correct and are the proofs complete? Or could I improve something?

Could you give me a hint about the last statement?

(Wondering)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mathmari said:
Could you give me a hint about the last statement?
(Wondering)
The empty set is a subset of any other set.

I'm sorry that I do not have the time to check your other work, but this is at least a hint about the last statement.
 
Krylov said:
The empty set is a subset of any other set.
mathmari said:
5. $A\subseteq B \Rightarrow f^{-1}(B)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$
So do you mean to take $A=\emptyset$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
So do you mean to take $A=\emptyset$ ? (Wondering)
Yes, and $B = N$.
What do you think about the veracity of statement #5?
 
Hey mathmari! (Smile)

You wrote: '$f(x)∈A∪B$. This means that either $f(x)∈A$ or $f(x)∈B$.'

Using 'either ... or ...' means that they cannot both be true, but that's not the case is it?
Shouldn't it be: '$f(x)∈A∪B$. This means that $f(x)∈A$ or $f(x)∈B$.'? (Wondering)
I think all occurrences of 'either' should be removed.

Other than that I think everything is correct! (Nod)
 
Krylov said:
Yes, and $B = N$.
What do you think about the veracity of statement #5?

So, for $A=\emptyset$ and $B=N$ we have that $\emptyset \subseteq N$.
Let $x\in f^{-1}(N)$ then we have that $f(x)\in N$.
It cannot hold that $f(x)\in \emptyset$ and so it cannot hold that $x\in f^{-1}(\emptyset)$.
Therefore, we have that $f^{-1}(N)\nsubseteq f^{-1}(\emptyset)$.
And so generally the implication $A\subseteq B \Rightarrow f^{-1}(B)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$ does not hold.

Is this correct? (Wondering)
I like Serena said:
You wrote: '$f(x)∈A∪B$. This means that either $f(x)∈A$ or $f(x)∈B$.'
Using 'either ... or ...' means that they cannot both be true, but that's not the case is it?
Shouldn't it be: '$f(x)∈A∪B$. This means that $f(x)∈A$ or $f(x)∈B$.'? (Wondering)
I think all occurrences of 'either' should be removed.
Other than that I think everything is correct! (Nod)

Ah ok! (Smile)

So, by '$f(x)∈A∪B$. This means that $f(x)∈A$ or $f(x)∈B$.' it is meant that both can be true, isn't it? Or do we have to mention it? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Is this correct?

So, by '$f(x)∈A∪B$. This means that $f(x)∈A$ or $f(x)∈B$.' it is meant that both can be true, isn't it? Or do we have to mention it?

Yep. All correct.
And there is no need to mention that both can be true - that is implied in the word 'or'.
If we want to be explicit about it, we can use 'and/or'. (Mmm)
 
I like Serena said:
Yep. All correct.
And there is no need to mention that both can be true - that is implied in the word 'or'.
If we want to be explicit about it, we can use 'and/or'. (Mmm)

Great! (Mmm)

Is the implication $A\subseteq B \Rightarrow f^{-1}(B)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$ true when a specific condition holds or is this never true? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Is the implication $A\subseteq B \Rightarrow f^{-1}(B)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$ true when a specific condition holds or is this never true? (Wondering)

Can we find an example that it's true?
What happens if $A$ and $B$ are $\varnothing$, equal to each other, or $N$? (Wondering)
 
  • #10
I like Serena said:
Can we find an example that it's true?
What happens if $A$ and $B$ are $\varnothing$, equal to each other, or $N$? (Wondering)

Ah if $A=B$ we have that $A\subseteq B=A$ and that $f^{-1}(B)=f^{-1}(A)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$. So, when the sets are equal to each other the implication is true, right? (Wondering)
 
  • #11
mathmari said:
Ah if $A=B$ we have that $A\subseteq B=A$ and that $f^{-1}(B)=f^{-1}(A)\subseteq f^{-1}(A)$. So, when the sets are equal to each other the implication is true, right?

Yep. (Nod)
 
  • #12
Thank you very much! (Mmm)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K