- #1
Pjpic
- 235
- 1
Do professionals use the term universe to mean what was created in the big bang?
The "universe" is all of space and time and all of the matter and contents within. The Big Bang is simply a theory that scientists believe explain how the universe is created.Pjpic said:Do professionals use the term universe to mean what was created in the big bang?
YesPjpic said:Do professionals use the term universe to mean what was created in the big bang?
Uh, quarky, that's not right (It is a pop-sci point of view). The Big Bang Theory says NOTHING about how the universe was created. It is a description of how the universe has evolved from approximately one Plank time after the singularity up to the present. The singularity is not part of the Big Bang Theory because we don't know what it was physically.ProfuselyQuarky said:The "universe" is all of space and time and all of the matter and contents within. The Big Bang is simply a theory that scientists believe explain how the universe is created.
Good point, The Big Bang presumes nothing about the parts of the universe that we can't see.bapowell said:The Big Bang theory describes the evolution of the observable universe from an early hot, dense state to our present epoch.
Yes, you're right. That's wrong. The fact that Big Bang Theory and Big Bang Singularity are so very similar (word-wise) always gets me. Sorry.phinds said:Uh, quarky, that's not right
Yes. Unambiguous question allows short answer.ProfuselyQuarky said:The answer to the OP is still yes, nonetheless.
Haha, yes, that's true.timmdeeg said:Yes. Unambiguous question allows short answer.
I disagree. When the short answer itself can lead to confusion, as it can in this case, then I think the longer answer is called for.timmdeeg said:Yes. Unambiguous question allows short answer.
And I don't see your point. In my opinion, the question "Do professionals use the term universe to mean what was created in the big bang?" can be answered with yes or no.phinds said:I disagree.
Read post #4timmdeeg said:And I don't see your point. In my opinion, the question "Do professionals use the term universe to mean what was created in the big bang?" can be answered with yes or no.
Why leads the answer "yes" to confusion?
Well post #4 is not an answer to the OP, it is commenting on something else.phinds said:Read post #4
Jeez, fella, you asked what is potentially confusing and I answered you. It seems you are being argumentative just for the sake of being argumentative. That's MY job heretimmdeeg said:Well post #4 is not an answer to the OP, it is commenting on something else.
phinds said:The Big Bang Theory ... is a description of how the universe has evolved from approximately one Plank time after the singularity up to the present.
The universe is defined as the entirety of all matter, energy, space, and time, including all planets, stars, galaxies, and other celestial bodies.
The big bang theory is a scientific explanation for the origin and evolution of the universe. It suggests that the universe began as a tiny, infinitely dense and hot point, known as a singularity, approximately 13.8 billion years ago. This singularity expanded rapidly, creating all matter and energy in the universe.
No, the universe and the big bang are not the same thing. The big bang is a scientific theory that explains the origin and evolution of the universe, while the universe is the actual physical space that contains all matter and energy.
The big bang theory explains that the universe began as a singularity and has been expanding ever since. This expansion is supported by evidence such as the redshift of distant galaxies and the cosmic microwave background radiation.
There are several other theories that attempt to explain the origin of the universe, including the steady state theory, the oscillating universe theory, and the inflationary theory. However, the big bang theory is currently the most widely accepted and supported by scientific evidence.