B Does an infinite universe contradict a Big Bang origin?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Big Bang and the concept of an infinite universe. Participants express confusion over how the Big Bang, which is often described as originating from a finite volume, can coexist with the idea of an infinite universe. It is clarified that the Big Bang occurred everywhere in the universe, regardless of whether the universe is finite or infinite, and that the observable universe is merely a limited portion of the whole. The conversation emphasizes that the entire universe was initially in a hot, dense state, and the observable universe's size does not imply that the rest of the universe was different. Ultimately, the Big Bang model applies universally, not just to the observable section.
  • #61
jackjack2025 said:
"Everyone else does"? You sure?
yes
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #62
jackjack2025 said:
This does not work in an infinite way.
yes, it does. You clearly haven't gotten your head around the concept of infinity and you apparently think it acts the same as a finite number. It doesn't.
 
  • #63
jackjack2025 said:
"Hilbert Hotel Expansion
@Ibix and the rest of us are quite comfortable with Cantor and transfinite cardinalities.

However, cardinality has nothing to do with metric expansion. No one is trying to say that the the cardinality of the set of stars now is less than the cardinality of the set of stars a moment from now.

We are not talking about counting rooms at all. We are talking about measuring the length of the carpet between rooms. The guests go to the beach for the day with 10 meters of carpet between adjacent rooms (for instance) and arrive back at the hotel to find 11 meters of carpet between adjacent rooms.

The guests do not have to run a measuring tape from one end of the hall to the other to observe such a change. They only have to measure one pair of rooms. Or enough to get a statistically significant sample.

In practice, the measurements that are made are not done with measuring tapes, of course. We use spectra, luminosity, time delays and various other hints to put together a coherent model for the shape of the universe and the distribution of stars, galaxies and clusters within it. The shape has a feature that is commonly referred to as metric expansion.

If this "metric expansion" does not fit with the meaning that you intuitively expect for "expanding universe" then that is not a problem with the idea of "metric expansion". The problem is with your non-standard interpretation of the meaning of the phrase.
 
  • Like
Likes Ibix
  • #64
jbriggs444 said:
If this "metric expansion" does not fit with the meaning that you intuitively expect for "expanding universe" then that is NOT a problem with the idea of "metric expansion". The problem is with your non-standard interpretation of the meaning of the phrase.
I think the word I added in red is what you had in mind.

EDIT: I see you beat me to it.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #65
jackjack2025 said:
From the first stake to the last is the same length
No, it isn't, because in a spatially infinite universe there is no "last stake". You simply can't apply this intuitive picture to the case under discussion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
11K