- 19,378
- 15,612
yesjackjack2025 said:"Everyone else does"? You sure?
The discussion centers on the relationship between the Big Bang and the concept of an infinite universe. Participants clarify that if the universe is infinite now, it has always been infinite, albeit denser in the past. The observable universe, which is finite, is merely a small portion of the entire universe, which expanded uniformly. The Big Bang is described as a phenomenon that occurred everywhere in the universe, not limited to the observable region, and models like eternal inflation suggest that the universe may extend infinitely into the past without an initial singularity.
PREREQUISITESAstronomers, cosmologists, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of the universe's origin and structure.
yesjackjack2025 said:"Everyone else does"? You sure?
yes, it does. You clearly haven't gotten your head around the concept of infinity and you apparently think it acts the same as a finite number. It doesn't.jackjack2025 said:This does not work in an infinite way.
@Ibix and the rest of us are quite comfortable with Cantor and transfinite cardinalities.jackjack2025 said:"Hilbert Hotel Expansion
I think the word I added in red is what you had in mind.jbriggs444 said:If this "metric expansion" does not fit with the meaning that you intuitively expect for "expanding universe" then that is NOT a problem with the idea of "metric expansion". The problem is with your non-standard interpretation of the meaning of the phrase.
No, it isn't, because in a spatially infinite universe there is no "last stake". You simply can't apply this intuitive picture to the case under discussion.jackjack2025 said:From the first stake to the last is the same length