Are you following the cricket world cup?
- Thread starter siddharth
- Start date
-
- Tags
- world cup
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
72 replies · 13K views
Physics news on Phys.org
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
- 7,643
- 1,602
Still raining.
The smaller the number of overs in the match, the more it favours Australia.
I soooooooooooooo much want Sri Lanka to win.
The smaller the number of overs in the match, the more it favours Australia.
I soooooooooooooo much want Sri Lanka to win.
Homework Helper
Gold Member
- 1,145
- 0
George Jones said:The smaller the number of overs in the match, the more it favours Australia.
True. Although, if jayasuriya gets going, they may have an advantage.
I soooooooooooooo much want Sri Lanka to win.
Me too, but those Australians look unbeatable. 98-0 in 16 overs
EDIT: Make that 104-0 in 16.1
EDIT2 : Yeesh, that's 108-0 in 16.2
Last edited:
neutrino
- 2,093
- 2
Why do they even bother playing the final?
neutrino
- 2,093
- 2
Are we going to see 300 scored in less than 40 overs for the first time?
Edit: Or the second time? I don't know the details of that 800+ runs match between Aus and SA.
Edit: Or the second time? I don't know the details of that 800+ runs match between Aus and SA.
neutrino
- 2,093
- 2
siddharth said:They've got to be the greatest cricket team of all time.
Duh!
They would probably be up there with Windies team from a few decades ago.
Last edited:
neutrino
- 2,093
- 2
Great catch from the captain! And there goes Hayden, who has been the dynamic half of the openers till now.
klusener
- 62
- 0
My god, Sri Lanka is being slaughtered out there. I hope this batting carnage sets up a thrilling chase though.
neutrino
- 2,093
- 2
281 in 38. Now, how pathetic is that! 
neutrino
- 2,093
- 2
Could this be the biggest, messiest mess in the history of the one-day cricket? Easily!
Anttech
- 237
- 0
booooring... Can anyone beat Oz when it matters, seems not..
Similar threads
- foxtrot_echo_
- · Replies 139 ·
- General Discussion
- Replies
- 139