MHB Are You Struggling with Quadratic Equations?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving quadratic equations by relating the roots and coefficients of two quadratic expressions. It establishes that if \( m \) and \( n \) are roots, their relationships can be expressed through equations derived from the coefficients of the quadratics. By equating coefficients from two sets of equations, the roots \( x_1 \) and \( x_2 \) are determined to be \( \gamma \) and \( \delta \). The conclusion confirms that the correct answer is (B), demonstrating a clear method for solving quadratic equations through systematic substitution and comparison. This approach effectively illustrates the relationships between roots and coefficients in quadratic equations.
DaalChawal
Messages
85
Reaction score
0
1628607224461.png
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi DaalChawal,

We can write
$$(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)+(x-\gamma)(x-\delta)=2x^2-(\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta)x+(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta)=0\implies $$
$$x^2-\frac 12(\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta)x+\frac 12(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta) = 0\tag 1$$

Since $m$ and $n$ are roots, we must have
$$(x-m)(x-n)=0\implies x^2-(m+n)x+mn=0\tag 2$$

The coefficients of equations (1) and (2) must be the same, so we have:
$$\begin{cases}m+n=\frac 12(\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta)\\mn=\frac 12(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta)\end{cases}\tag 3$$

We have
$$2(x-m)(x-n)-(x-\alpha)(x-\beta)=x^2-(2(m+n)-\alpha-\beta)x+(2mn-\alpha\beta)=0$$
Let its roots be $x_1$ and $x_2$, then we must have:
$$(x-x_1)(x-x_2)=x^2-(x_1+x_2)x+x_1x_2=0$$

Again, the coefficients must match, so we have
$$\begin{cases}x_1+x_2=2(m+n)-\alpha-\beta \\ x_1x_2=2mn-\alpha\beta\end{cases}\tag 4$$

Substitute (3) in (4) to find:
$$\begin{cases}x_1+x_2=2\cdot\frac 12(\alpha+\beta+\gamma+\delta)-\alpha-\beta = \gamma+\delta \\
x_1x_2=2\cdot \frac 12(\alpha\beta+\gamma\delta)-\alpha\beta = \gamma\delta\end{cases}\tag 5$$

Therefore (B) is the correct answer.
 
Thank you Sir🙂
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...

Similar threads

Back
Top