MHB Arithmetic Sequence Confusion // a{n-1} and a{n+1}

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the arithmetic sequence defined by a{0}=2 and the recurrence relation a{n+1}=3a{n}−1. Participants clarify that to find a{3}, one must first calculate a{1} and a{2} using the previous terms. The confusion arises from interpreting the relationship between a{n} and a{n+1}, with some mistakenly thinking it implies using the next term instead of the current one. Ultimately, the correct approach involves sequentially applying the recurrence relation to derive the values, leading to the conclusion that a{3}=41.
Machara
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
So I have this problem I'm stuck on wrapping my head around a particular problem "In the sequence a{n}, let a{0}=2. If a{n+1} = 3 a{n} −1, then what is the value of a3?"

I understand it's following the pattern of each term, and that with Arithmetic sequence a{n-1} means you would use the a{n} term immediately prior (e.g solving for a{2} you would use the result of a{1}) but in this particular problem the sequence is a{n+1} which one would assume you would use the result of the term after? since it's Plus 1 not Minus 1, but that doesn't make sense.

On top of I can elaborate the solutions answer on my worksheet to explain what's happening, and it's saying for a{2} you would input the solution from a{1} to solve for a{2} but wouldn't that be implying the sequence is a{n-1} not a{n+1}?

What's the difference? am I missing something?
This is the elaborated solution that the webpage answers for me:

"Explanation:

To find a{3}
, first find a{1} and a{2}. The sequence says a(n+1)=3a{n}−1, and we know a{0}=2. So, we can find the rest of the sequence, starting with a{1}

.
a{0}=2
a{1}=3(2)−1=5
a{2}=3(5)−1=14
a{3}=3(14)−1=41

So, a{3}=41"
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Machara said:
So I have this problem I'm stuck on wrapping my head around a particular problem "In the sequence a{n}, let a{0}=2. If a{n+1} = 3 a{n} −1, then what is the value of a3?"
Do you understand what "a{0}= 2, a{n+1}= 3a{n}- 1" means?

You are told that a{0}= 2. a{1}= a{0+ 1} so a{1}= 3a{0}- 1= 3(2) -1= 5. Then a{2}= a{1+ 1}= 3a{1}- 1= 3(5)- 1= 15- 1= 14. Finally, a{3}= a(2+ 1}= 3a(2)- 1= 3(14)- 1= 42- 1= 4.

I understand it's following the pattern of each term, and that with Arithmetic sequence a{n-1} means you would use the a{n} term immediately prior (e.g solving for a{2} you would use the result of a{1}) but in this particular problem the sequence is a{n+1} which one would assume you would use the result of the term after? since it's Plus 1 not Minus 1, but that doesn't make sense.

On top of I can elaborate the solutions answer on my worksheet to explain what's happening, and it's saying for a{2} you would input the solution from a{1} to solve for a{2} but wouldn't that be implying the sequence is a{n-1} not a{n+1}?
I have no idea where you got "a-1". The problem clearly says a{n+1}

What's the difference? am I missing something?
This is the elaborated solution that the webpage answers for me:

"Explanation:

To find a{3}
, first find a{1} and a{2}. The sequence says a(n+1)=3a{n}−1, and we know a{0}=2. So, we can find the rest of the sequence, starting with a{1}

.
a{0}=2
a{1}=3(2)−1=5
a{2}=3(5)−1=14
a{3}=3(14)−1=41

So, a{3}=41"
I don't see what you could be misunderstanding about this. They took each "a" value, in turn, and calculated 3a(n)- 1 to find the next "a".
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top