Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the phenomenon of scholarly articles with numerous authors, particularly in the field of physics. Participants explore examples of such articles, the conventions for author listings, and the implications of having many contributors in peer-reviewed journals.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant seeks examples of peer-reviewed articles with many authors, noting that physics may have articles with dozens or hundreds of authors.
- Another suggests looking into experimental particle physics as a relevant area.
- A participant mentions a specific article in physics with 632 authors and asks for the reference.
- It is noted that there are papers with thousands of authors, and participants are encouraged to explore suggested journals.
- Questions arise regarding how peer-reviewed journals handle the publication of articles with many authors, including whether all names and credentials are listed or just those of lead authors.
- A specific journal, Physical Review D, is recommended as a source for finding such articles, with a link provided to an example.
- Another participant shares a link to an article they found interesting, contributing to the exploration of the topic.
- It is highlighted that in experimental particle physics, it is customary to list all participants in alphabetical order, regardless of their status, with a personal anecdote shared about being a lead author in a smaller collaboration.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally agree on the existence of articles with many authors in physics, particularly in experimental particle physics. However, there is no consensus on specific examples or the practices of different journals regarding author listings.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty about the specific practices of various journals in listing authors and credentials, and there are references to articles that may not be easily found without specific guidance.
Who May Find This Useful
This discussion may be useful for researchers interested in the publication practices of scholarly articles, particularly in fields with large collaborative efforts, such as physics and experimental particle physics.