- #1

strangerep

Science Advisor

- 3,215

- 1,068

Let ##F : R^n \to R## be a degree-1 positive-homogeneous function. I.e., ##F(\lambda y) = \lambda F(y),## for all real ##\lambda>0## and any nonzero ##y\in R^n##.

In this paper, near the middle of p2 at eq(4), the authors introduce

$$\ell_a ~=~ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y^a} ~,$$and then they claim that because ##F## is 1-homogeneous, it follows that ##\ell_a## is necessarily of the form:

##\ell_a ~=~ y^a/F ~.##

ISTM that one can only claim that ##\ell_a## is 0-homogeneous (by the Euler homogeneous function theorem), and there are other 0-homogeneous functions besides their ##y^a/F## .

Am I missing something, or are the authors wrong?

In this paper, near the middle of p2 at eq(4), the authors introduce

$$\ell_a ~=~ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y^a} ~,$$and then they claim that because ##F## is 1-homogeneous, it follows that ##\ell_a## is necessarily of the form:

##\ell_a ~=~ y^a/F ~.##

ISTM that one can only claim that ##\ell_a## is 0-homogeneous (by the Euler homogeneous function theorem), and there are other 0-homogeneous functions besides their ##y^a/F## .

Am I missing something, or are the authors wrong?

**Edit:**Maybe they meant ##F/y^a## ? But that still seems wrong if ##n > 1##.
Last edited: