MHB As for the question,How can I simplify (8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex6977
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the expression [(8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3. The correct simplification leads to the result 2/x^1/18, while the initial misunderstanding resulted in 8/x^1/18. Participants clarify that applying the exponent to both the numerator and denominator is crucial for accuracy. The importance of converting rational exponents to a common denominator for subtraction is emphasized. Ultimately, the correct application of the exponent resolves the confusion, leading to the accurate simplification.
Alex6977
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi i have a question i know the answer to but don't understand how it was reached.

[(8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3

it comes to 2/x^1/18
but how? I got 8/x^1/18

thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Simplificaiton issues

Hello and welcome! :D

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\left(\frac{8}{x^{1/6}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{8^{1/3}}{\left(x^{1/6}\right)^{1/3}}=\frac{2}{x^{1/18}}$$
 
Re: Simplificaiton issues

I see i tried applying the outside ^1/3 first to eliminate that right off the bat. which would be

8x^1/6 over X^2/9.

but that's still corrrect so far right?

then that equals.

8x^3/18 over x^4/18. but then it starts to look bad and i get lost. maybe you just can't do it that way?

- - - Updated - - -

Oh and thanks
 
Your first step is valid, you just need to remember to apply it to the 8 as well, so that you have:

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{2x^{1/6}}{x^{2/9}}$$

Your next step is good too, to convert the rational exponents to a common denominator so they can be subtracted:

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{2x^{3/18}}{x^{4/18}}=\frac{2}{x^{1/18}}$$
 
I can't follow that. sorry

- - - Updated - - -

nevermind its displaying right now

- - - Updated - - -

AHHHHH i didn't apply it to the 8. THere we go. Thanks a ton
 
Alex6977 said:
I can't follow that. sorry

- - - Updated - - -

nevermind its displaying right now

- - - Updated - - -

AHHHHH i didn't apply it to the 8. THere we go. Thanks a ton

Yeah, I had some missing brackets in my $\LaTeX$ code, and I didn't preview, so you saw a real mess before I got it fixed. :D
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
823
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K