MHB As for the question,How can I simplify (8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alex6977
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Issues
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on simplifying the expression [(8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3. The correct simplification leads to the result 2/x^1/18, while the initial misunderstanding resulted in 8/x^1/18. Participants clarify that applying the exponent to both the numerator and denominator is crucial for accuracy. The importance of converting rational exponents to a common denominator for subtraction is emphasized. Ultimately, the correct application of the exponent resolves the confusion, leading to the accurate simplification.
Alex6977
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi i have a question i know the answer to but don't understand how it was reached.

[(8x^1/2)/(x^2/3)]^1/3

it comes to 2/x^1/18
but how? I got 8/x^1/18

thx
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Simplificaiton issues

Hello and welcome! :D

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\left(\frac{8}{x^{1/6}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{8^{1/3}}{\left(x^{1/6}\right)^{1/3}}=\frac{2}{x^{1/18}}$$
 
Re: Simplificaiton issues

I see i tried applying the outside ^1/3 first to eliminate that right off the bat. which would be

8x^1/6 over X^2/9.

but that's still corrrect so far right?

then that equals.

8x^3/18 over x^4/18. but then it starts to look bad and i get lost. maybe you just can't do it that way?

- - - Updated - - -

Oh and thanks
 
Your first step is valid, you just need to remember to apply it to the 8 as well, so that you have:

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{2x^{1/6}}{x^{2/9}}$$

Your next step is good too, to convert the rational exponents to a common denominator so they can be subtracted:

$$\left(\frac{8x^{1/2}}{x^{2/3}}\right)^{1/3}=\frac{2x^{3/18}}{x^{4/18}}=\frac{2}{x^{1/18}}$$
 
I can't follow that. sorry

- - - Updated - - -

nevermind its displaying right now

- - - Updated - - -

AHHHHH i didn't apply it to the 8. THere we go. Thanks a ton
 
Alex6977 said:
I can't follow that. sorry

- - - Updated - - -

nevermind its displaying right now

- - - Updated - - -

AHHHHH i didn't apply it to the 8. THere we go. Thanks a ton

Yeah, I had some missing brackets in my $\LaTeX$ code, and I didn't preview, so you saw a real mess before I got it fixed. :D
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Is it possible to arrange six pencils such that each one touches the other five? If so, how? This is an adaption of a Martin Gardner puzzle only I changed it from cigarettes to pencils and left out the clues because PF folks don’t need clues. From the book “My Best Mathematical and Logic Puzzles”. Dover, 1994.
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top