Assessing Presidential Candidates: Qualifications and Competencies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kevin_Axion
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the perceived qualifications and competencies of Rick Perry as a presidential candidate in 2012, particularly regarding his controversial statements about religion and politics. Participants express skepticism about Perry's ability to appeal to a broader electorate, citing his attempts to court the Evangelical vote in Iowa as desperate. The conversation highlights the disconnect between religious rhetoric and political competency, with contributors questioning the appropriateness of intertwining religion with governance. Overall, the consensus is that Perry's approach may undermine his candidacy and reflect poorly on American political discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of U.S. political dynamics and electoral strategies
  • Familiarity with the role of religion in American politics
  • Knowledge of key political figures and their public statements, particularly Rick Perry
  • Awareness of public opinion trends and polling methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of religious rhetoric on political campaigns in the U.S.
  • Examine case studies of presidential candidates who have integrated religious themes into their platforms
  • Analyze polling data from the 2012 presidential election to understand voter sentiment
  • Explore the concept of separation of church and state in American governance
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for political analysts, campaign strategists, and anyone interested in the intersection of religion and politics in the United States, particularly in the context of presidential elections.

  • #31
Ivan Seeking said:
http://www.metroweekly.com/news/last_word/2011/12/rick-perry-denounces-gay-soldi.html

that makes him a zealot, a hypocrite, anti-Constitution [by inference], and a liar.

You say that as if it were a bad thing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Did you know that in 1968 Frank Zappa predicted the election of Reagan as President via modern marketing techniques?
 
  • #33
Jimmy Snyder said:
I'm not ashamed to admit that I'm a physicist, but you don't need to be in the lab every day to know there's something wrong in this country when gays can pray openly in public but our kids can't openly conduct experiments or celebrate Darwin's birthday in church.
As dog catcher, I'll end the church's war on science. And I'll fight against liberal arts attacks on our scientific heritage.
Science made America smart. It can make her smart again.
I'm Jimmy Snyder and I approve this message.
:smile: Obviously another science fundamentalist nutcase. Since when does intelligence have to do with ... anything?!?

And why are the liberal arts called the liberal arts. They seem pretty conservative to me.

What's up with this Darwin stuff? Why are homos called gays?

Rick Perry ... buwahahahahaha.
 
  • #34
Thanks for posting Kevin! I was looking for this one last night.

For those who aspire to become powerful through political influence, it often becomes impossible to prevent their feet from finding their way into their mouth.
 
Last edited:
  • #35
Q_Goest said:
For those who aspire to become powerful through political influence, it often becomes impossible to prevent their feet from finding their way into their mouth.
It's tough to find an honest politician. There was an article yesterday (on Yahoo?HuffPost?GoogleNews?) about how politicians never lie. They might exaggerate, prevaricate, be "factually challenged" or be prone to selectively omit pertinent facts, etc, but they never lie. The article was written after analysis of pieces in the "liberal media" in which politicians were never called "liars" even after being caught telling whoppers.

I'll see if I can find that link again.
 
  • #36
turbo said:
It's tough to find an honest politician. There was an article yesterday (on Yahoo?HuffPost?GoogleNews?) about how politicians never lie. They might exaggerate, prevaricate, be "factually challenged" or be prone to selectively omit pertinent facts, etc, but they never lie. The article was written after analysis of pieces in the "liberal media" in which politicians were never called "liars" even after being caught telling whoppers.

I'll see if I can find that link again.
I can see how they might not be called liars. Maybe just as you say, exaggerate things, etc... But I guess what strikes me is their motivation. What motivates people to become politicians or even upper level management at large corporations?

From my experience with the corporate world, it seems pretty rare to find people that are genuinely motivated by something other than power, and those people generally don't get too far - they wind up in middle management. I guess I see the CEO's and politicians of this world as being people who revel in the power of the position as opposed to being people that revel in the opportunity to improve society. I guess that's why I see politicians as being people who will say what they think it will take to gain the power of political influence, whether it be slight exaggeration or misleading statements that omit pertinent facts as you say.

Maybe politicians should be elected like PF has their annual awards... One day you wake up and your name is on a ballet and the next thing you know you've either been voted in or passed over.
 
  • #37
KingNothing said:
You have to remember, these are all studies where people identify their own religion. There is a whole world of psychological pressures that affect one's answer. People don't always respond truthfully (whether consciously or subconsciously) under those pressures. Humans naturally adapt their self-image to fit situations.

Heck, I remember when I was just starting to talk, my parents told me I was Christian and I believed them. If you had asked me if I was Christian, I would have said "yes". I didn't even know who Jesus was or a single moral pillar of the religion. Sadly, there are people whose dedication in adulthood is no deeper than mine as a child.

The reason I'm bringing all this up, is that I don't think the US is as 'hardcore Christian' as that graph would suggest. There are a lot of people who identify as Christians who don't go to church, don't follow any Christian moral guidelines, and support separation of church and state.

How these people get on the national tv then? Also note that Perry is governor of Texas.
 
  • #38
rootX said:
How these people get on the national tv then? Also note that Perry is governor of Texas.

We were talking about the US, not Texas. :smile:

Every President we've ever had proclaimed Christian beliefs. But most didn't create imaginary wars on religion, or use their faith as a primary sales tool. There are vast differences between the classic mainstream Christian, and what we see in politics today. The Bible belt [which includes Texas] has always been pretty extreme.

Note that he never mentions that Obama is also a Christian.

It's like I've been saying for a couple of years now, the Republicans have been driven so far to the right that they drove right over a cliff. Rick Perry is certainly not representitive of "the average American". He is typical Bible Belt material.
 
Last edited:
  • #39


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NtFzuGeCfkc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cg1reOJV27w
 
  • #40


micromass said:
...

Doggonnit, tham thar homosexshals have no right getting shot at!
 
  • #41


Ivan Seeking said:
Doggonnit, tham thar homosexshals have no right getting shot at!

That man is an imbecile. :rolleyes:
 
  • #42


Dembadon said:
That man is an imbecile. :rolleyes:
Strange watching someone destroy their career so quickly and without any outside influence.
 
  • #43


Don't forget "Dubbya" won - Oh yeah but this guy doesn't have the right last name and a brother who's governor of Florida.
 
  • #44


netgypsy said:
Don't forget "Dubbya" won - Oh yeah but this guy doesn't have the right last name and a brother who's governor of Florida either.
I don't get it, what's the comparison?
 
  • #45


Evo said:
Strange watching someone destroy their career so quickly and without any outside influence.

One thing surprises me how they build this kind of career in the first place.So far, I have stayed away from criticizing Rick Perry believing that his opinions/views represent a certain portion of American population.
 
  • #46


netgypsy said:
Don't forget "Dubbya" won -

How could I? When I heard that Bush beat Gore, my head exploded and I still haven't found all the parts.

Gore invented computers for crying outloud!
 
  • #47


I thought it was the internet?

Or was it the hair dryer
 
  • #48


rootX said:
One thing surprises me how they build this kind of career in the first place.

Just tell the people what they want to hear.
 
  • #49


netgypsy said:
I thought it was the internet?

Or was it the hair dryer

Purdy sure he worked at Bell Labs... it was either that or he had bell-bottoms and a black lab.
 
  • #50


What surprises me is that any sane person would run in the first place.
 
  • #51


netgypsy said:
What surprises me is that any sane person would run in the first place.

Who says they do?
 
  • #52


rootX said:
...

So far, I have stayed away from criticizing Rick Perry believing that his opinions/views represent a certain portion of American population.

Unfortunately, they do. :cry:
 
  • #53


You won't catch me criticizing him either. I live where 80 year old ladies are packing 45's and certainly will use them.

Speaking of al Gore I was curious about exactly what he said that caused the media to say he claimed to have invented the internet. Pretty interesting.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp
 
  • #54


rootX said:
So far, I have stayed away from criticizing Rick Perry believing that his opinions/views represent a certain portion of American population.

He uses faith as a sales pitch and then lies about Obama. What about this is Christian? Why does he need to sell his religion? "I am holier than "THEM" as a campaign slogan? Please. That has more in common with used car sales than it does faith. This guy [and Romney] are utterly transparent.
 
  • #55


netgypsy said:
You won't catch me criticizing him either. I live where 80 year old ladies are packing 45's and certainly will use them.

Speaking of al Gore I was curious about exactly what he said that caused the media to say he claimed to have invented the internet. Pretty interesting.

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/internet.asp

He was largely responsible for driving the "information superhighway", as it was called then, and people laughed then too. Fact is that he was dead on.
 
  • #56
One time when someone brought it up (when he was a guest on some show), he admitted that it wasn't his greatest moment, and explained it with "I was up late the night before, inventing the camcorder".
 
  • #57
The saddest thing about Rick Perry, like every disgusting politician, is that they were voted for. It doesn't matter too much if Perry really believes that a prayer rally is an appropriate response to a natural disaster or that he is homophobic because of his favourite ancient book, the sad thing is people saw him and thought "that's who we want deciding state policy"
 
  • #58
Big plays by Rick Perry. Big plays
 
  • #59


Ivan Seeking said:
He uses faith as a sales pitch and then lies about Obama. What about this is Christian? Why does he need to sell his religion? "I am holier than "THEM" as a campaign slogan? Please. That has more in common with used car sales than it does faith. This guy [and Romney] are utterly transparent.

I don't understand your complains at all. Doesn't every candidate sell something either science, jobs, terrorism, or what not?

Obama is in favor of more liberal practices (gay culture/abortions/embryonic stem cell research), that many people like Perry are not. I don't see anything wrong in coming up on the national tv and voicing one's opinions.
 
  • #60


rootX said:
I don't understand your complains at all. Doesn't every candidate sell something either science, jobs, terrorism, or what not?

Obama is in favor of more liberal practices (gay culture/abortions/embryonic stem cell research), that many people like Perry are not. I don't see anything wrong in coming up on the national tv and voicing one's opinions.
Yeah, that's what he did all right. :smile: The problem is, he wants to be President.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
17K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K