Astronomical spectroscopy and doppler shift.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around astronomical spectroscopy and the Doppler shift, particularly focusing on how redshift affects the interpretation of spectral data from distant stars and the distinction between intrinsically red objects and those that are redshifted. Participants explore the implications of these concepts for identifying elements in astronomical observations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the spectrum of a specific element acts as a "fingerprint" with distinct patterns that remain recognizable even when redshifted.
  • Others argue that the redshift phenomenon was discovered through systematic shifts in spectral lines, which correlate with distance and contribute to our understanding of the universe's evolution.
  • A participant questions whether the spectrum of an intrinsically red object would differ from that of a redshifted object, seeking clarification on the nature of their spectral lines.
  • One participant mentions that certain carbon compounds can create a 'fog' in the spectrum, masking weaker signals, which complicates the identification of elements.
  • Another analogy is drawn between the Doppler shift of sound waves and spectral lines, suggesting that recognizable patterns can indicate shifts in position.
  • There are inquiries about the use of spectroscopy on the moon, with some participants noting that the moon reflects sunlight and does not emit light, which may affect the application of spectroscopy.
  • Neutral hydrogen is highlighted as a common spectral fingerprint in astronomy, with specific series like the Lyman and Balmer series being noted for their characteristic shifts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and uncertainty regarding the effects of redshift on spectral interpretation and the application of spectroscopy to different celestial bodies. Multiple competing views remain on the specifics of how redshift influences the identification of elements.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the application of spectroscopy on the moon compared to stars, particularly concerning the nature of light emission and reflection. There is also mention of unresolved details about the specifics of spectral analysis in different contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying astronomy, spectroscopy, and the effects of redshift on spectral analysis, as well as individuals curious about the identification of elements in various celestial bodies.

ViolentCorpse
Messages
190
Reaction score
1
Hi!

I have two (stupid) questions:

1) We can determine what elements are present in distant stars by studying their spectrum, right? But if the spectrum of some star is redshifted, wouldn't we be fooled into believing some elements to be present there that might not really be there, due to the shift in the spectrum?

2) How can we tell whether an inherently red object is redshifted?

Many thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hey ViolentCorpse, these are excellent questions.

1) The spectrum of a specific element is like a "fingerprint" -- it includes a bunch of individual lines with specific spacings between them. The spectra for different elements appear as distinct patterns. Even if they are redshifted (or blueshifted), the patterns remain disctint and recognizable.

2) What's an "inherently red object?" The redshift phenomenon was discovered by observing that certain patterns of lines (like the Hydrogen series) were systematically shifted toward the red end of the spectrum. The amount of redshift turned out to be correlated to distance, leading to the modern understanding of the universe's evolution.

- Warren
 
Thank you very much for the answers, chroot!

And for my second question, I meant to say "intrinsically red", as in something that is red by it's very nature. Will the spectrum obtained by such an object be the same as one that is not intrinsically red but rather redshifted?
I'm sorry for not being able to explain things lucidly.

Thank you again, chroot!
 
As Warren said, elements and simple compounds each have a bunch of characteristic lines.

These 'handprints' may appear multiple times, each set with different shifts, as light from eg a quasar passes through foreground clouds.

Even if the source object is red, there will be emission and absorption lines. The problem, IIRC, is that some carbon compounds have so many closely spaced lines that they form a 'fog' which masks all but the strongest individual signals...

A rough analogy is 'tree-ring' dating, where 'handprints' of 'long & short' gaps can be matched across different trees and cut timbers, the overlaps thus spanning many centuries. (This also helps to calibrate carbon dating results. ;- )
 
Thanks a lot, Nik2213! You guys are awesome! :D
 
Another useful analogy might be the Doppler shift of sound waves, like the whine of a racecar and how the tone drops as it goes past, changing from moving toward us and then moving away. Now imagine the racecar was blasting out your favorite song-- you would be able to tell if the car was moving toward or away from you becuase you could tell if the notes you normally recognize were shifted to higher or lower tones. The pattern of notes is like the pattern of spectral lines-- you recognize them well enough to know when they have been shifted. It could be a different song that just happens to use all the same notes, only shifted, but that's very unlikely.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Are there any 'fingerprint' examples of at least a couple elements IE Titanium on the moon ?
 
remsikt said:
Are there any 'fingerprint' examples of at least a couple elements IE Titanium on the moon ?

I don't think we can use the same spectroscopy on the moon as we can on stars. The moon only reflects sunlight, it does not emit light on it's own. However I do believe we still can use spectroscopy, just differently. I'm not sure on the details of all of it.
 
remsikt said:
Are there any 'fingerprint' examples of at least a couple elements IE Titanium on the moon ?
The lines of neutral hydrogen atoms are one commonly used fingerprint in astronomy, because hydrogen is abundant and the H atom has a simple structure (at low density) that is easily calculated. You get spectral fingerprints called "series", like the Lyman series or the Balmer series, and the shifts between the lines in the series are very characteristic of hydrogen. Then if all the lines are shifted by the same factor (as for Doppler shifts and cosmological redshifts), it is easy to know that you have hydrogen lines, and you can also know by what factor they are shifted. This is hugely important in astronomy, from detecting extrasolar planets (by looking at shifts in lines of the star, not the planet) to doing cosmology.
 
  • #10
The moon has no emission spectrum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K