Astrophysics + (Computer Science or Computer Engineering)?

Click For Summary
A freshman at the University of Wisconsin-Madison plans to major in astrophysics and is considering a double major in computer science or computer engineering. The discussion emphasizes that computer science is more beneficial for astrophysics, as modern research heavily relies on programming, simulations, and data management. Skills in computer science enhance marketability, especially for those pursuing graduate studies in astrophysics or physics. While computer engineering has its applications, particularly in hardware for simulations, it is generally viewed as less advantageous than computer science for this field. Overall, coupling astrophysics with computer science is seen as a strategic choice for future career opportunities.
jspoerl2
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am going to be a freshman at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and I (for-sure) plan on majoring in astrophysics as it is my foremost passion. I also happen to have a liking for the computer related fields and having those skills makes myself more marketable for jobs. I plan on adding computer science or computer engineering (or something similar if anyone has better ideas) to make a double major. Can anyone advise as to which might be better between the two computer fields or if there is a better field to accompany astrophysics. Also, if there are any people out there with astrophysics degrees/majors, what applications are there of the computer sciences/engineering in that field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think coupling the astrophysics major with computer science would be extremely useful. A lot of modern astrophysics research relies on programming and doing computer simulations. Astronomy/astrophysics research typically gathers loads and loads of data, so being able to work with databases can be important. This is especially if you plan on going to grad school in astronomy or astrophysics (or physics in general). Typically if you're wanting to do more theoretical/computational stuff, the programming skills physics/astrophysics majors gain is their strongest asset in terms of marketability.

Computer engineering plays a role as well, since the simulations generally require advanced computing power and video cards. This requires some hardware knowledge, but in general I don't think double majoring in computer engineering would be as useful as computer science.
 
esuna said:
I think coupling the astrophysics major with computer science would be extremely useful. A lot of modern astrophysics research relies on programming and doing computer simulations. Astronomy/astrophysics research typically gathers loads and loads of data, so being able to work with databases can be important. This is especially if you plan on going to grad school in astronomy or astrophysics (or physics in general). Typically if you're wanting to do more theoretical/computational stuff, the programming skills physics/astrophysics majors gain is their strongest asset in terms of marketability.

Computer engineering plays a role as well, since the simulations generally require advanced computing power and video cards. This requires some hardware knowledge, but in general I don't think double majoring in computer engineering would be as useful as computer science.

I agree. Computer science would be much more useful than computer engineering in your application
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
801
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K