Asymptotic evaluation of Laplace inverse transform

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the asymptotic evaluation of Laplace inverse transforms, particularly integrals of the form \(\oint_{C} ds f(s) e^{st}\) and \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxf(a+ix)e^{ixt}\) as \(t\) approaches infinity. The method of stationary phase is highlighted as a key technique for evaluating these integrals, emphasizing the importance of stationary points where \(p'(t_0)=0\). Contributions from both the stationary points and the limits of the integral are crucial for obtaining the asymptotic expression. The discussion references Olver's book, "Asymptotics and Special Functions," for a comprehensive understanding of the method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis, particularly contour integration.
  • Familiarity with asymptotic analysis techniques.
  • Knowledge of the method of stationary phase.
  • Basic concepts of Laplace transforms and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of stationary phase in detail.
  • Explore the contributions of stationary points in asymptotic evaluations.
  • Read Olver's "Asymptotics and Special Functions" for advanced techniques.
  • Investigate the steepest descent method for complex integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers involved in complex analysis, particularly those working with Laplace transforms and asymptotic evaluations in their research or applications.

tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
If we have integrals of the form:

\oint_{C} ds f(s) e^{st} for t\sim \infty

or \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dxf(a+ix)e^{ixt}

In both cases i would like to know some techniques to evaluate 'asymptotically' the integrals given above for big t using only a few residues or other methods... thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What you are looking for is the method of stationary phase. It is called this way because if one consider the integral

I(x)=\int_a^b e^{ixp(t)}q(t)dt,

then the integrand oscillates rapidly in such way that the oscillations cancel out, but near stationary points (p'(t_0)=0), it oscillates more slowly, hence contributing more to the integral. To obtain the expansion, we consider the contributions given by this stationary points, and the edges of the interval.

Near t=a, the integrand is approximately

\exp[ix\{p(a)+(t-a)p'(a)\}]q(a).

An indefinite integral of this function is

\frac{\exp[ix\{p(a)+(t-a)p'(a)\}]q(a)}{ixp'(a)},

provided that p'(a)\ne 0. The lower limit t=a asympototically contributes

-\frac{e^{ixp(a)}q(a)}{ixp'(a)}

to I(x). In similar fashion, the point t=b contributes asymptotically

\frac{e^{ixp(b)}q(b)}{ixp'(b)}.

Next, if t_0 \in (a,b) is a stationary point of p(t), then near this point the integrand is approximately

\exp[ix\{p(t_0)+(t-t_0)^2p''(t_0)\}]q(t_0),

provided that p''(t_0) and q(t_0) are not zero. Since we believe that only a neighborhood of t_0 contributes, we extend the domain to the whole real axis, so we can explicitly evaluate the integral obtained from such reasoning

\int_{-\infty}^\infty \exp[\pm iy t^2]dt=e^{\pm i\pi/4}\left(\frac{\pi}{y}\right)^{1/2}\qquad (y>0).

So the contribution to I(x) from the neighborhood of t_0 is expected to be

e^{\pm i \pi/4}q(t_0)\exp\{ixp(t_0)\}\left|\frac{2\pi}{xp''(t_0)}\right|^{1/2},

where the upper and lower sign is taken accordingly as xp''(t_0) is positive or negative.

The asymptotic expression for I(x) will be the sum of all contributions from stationary points along with the ones of the upper and lower limits of the integral.

You can find more terms considering higher stationary points.

Full exposition of this method can be found in Olver's great book Asymptotics and Special Functions, which include complex variables and contour integration.
 
Last edited:
Thanks 'AIRAVATA' the problem is that Laplace transform uses the integral..

\oint _{C} ds f(s)e^{st}

as you can see , even for big 't' the function st has no 'extremal' except when s=-oo or s=oo, hence saddle point or steepest descent method can't be applied, I'm downloading from E-mule the book you pointed to me , to see if i get a clearer result, thankx..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K