At most explicit time-dependent operator

  • Thread starter carllacan
  • Start date
  • #1
274
3
Hi.

I have a little language problem. I'm studying in Germany, and my German is... nicht sehr gut, so I sometimes have problems understanding the exercises. The one I'm having issues right now has a part which says einen höchstens explizit zeitabhängigen Ope-rator im Schrödingerbild.

My translation for this is "An at most explicitly time-dependent operator in Schrödinger picture." This doesn't make any sense: how can a Schrödinger-picture operator be time dependent? And what does it mean by "at most explicitly"

Thank you for your time.

PD: if you happen to speak German I'd would appreciate if you checked my translation.

PPD: I know I could simply ask the teacher, but... I should have made this exercise way earlier, and I'm kind of ashamed to openly tell him that I am doing it now, so I'd like to avoid it if possible.
 
Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #3
274
3
There is not much. I am given the Hamiltonian for an Harmonic oscillator and I am told to find the time-dependence of ##O_H= U^{\dagger}(t, t_0)O_SU(t, t_0)##, where ##O_S## is the mentioned "at most explicitly time-dependent operator in Schrödinger picture.", and U is the time-development operator.

Maybe I am to just state the Heisenberg equation of motion for O?
 
  • #4
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
201
The Heisenberg equation of motion is ##\frac{dO_H}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar}[H_H, O_H] + \frac{\partial O_S}{\partial t}##. I think he's saying, keep the ##\frac{\partial O_S}{\partial t}## term.
 
  • #5
274
3
The Heisenberg equation of motion is ##\frac{dO_H}{dt} = \frac{i}{\hbar}[H_H, O_H] + \frac{\partial O_S}{\partial t}##. I think he's saying, keep the ##\frac{\partial O_S}{\partial t}## term.

I've never seen it in that form. I don't understand it, isn't the point of the Schrödinger picture that operators are time-independent?
 
  • #6
Bill_K
Science Advisor
Insights Author
4,155
201
I've never seen it in that form. I don't understand it, isn't the point of the Schrödinger picture that operators are time-independent?
Usually, but not always.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heisenberg_picture#Mathematical_details

Ballentine p 91 said:
"The operator could have intrinsic time dependence if it represented the potential of a variable external field, or if it were the component of a tensor defined with respect to a rotating coordinate system."
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Related Threads on At most explicit time-dependent operator

Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
17
Views
7K
Top