Atheistic explanations for the Big Bang?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter plum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the philosophical implications of the Big Bang theory, particularly regarding the nature of time and existence. Participants argue that the universe likely began from a highly condensed state, possibly triggered by an event analogous to a hydrogen bomb explosion. The concept of a multiverse with finite "bubble" universes is proposed as a resolution to paradoxes surrounding the beginning of time, challenging traditional notions of singularities and infinities. The dialogue emphasizes the complexity of understanding existence beyond scientific frameworks.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Big Bang theory
  • Familiarity with philosophical concepts of time and existence
  • Knowledge of multiverse theories
  • Basic grasp of scientific terminology related to cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of multiverse theories in cosmology
  • Research philosophical perspectives on time and existence
  • Investigate the scientific basis of the Big Bang theory
  • Examine the concept of singularities in physics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, cosmologists, and anyone interested in the intersection of science and existential questions regarding the universe's origins.

plum
Messages
136
Reaction score
0
This definitely is a philosophical question, since the time/space outside of this theory cannot be theorized about scientifically. Since (assuming it happened) things expanded exponentially at insane temperatures in the first fraction of a second, one must assume that something happened on a macrocosmic level that was analogous to a hydrogen bomb exploding. And did something come from nothing? I find that hard to accept. Before the universe really began, it must have been a long dormant highly condensed ball that was triggered by something, no?
 
Space news on Phys.org
It's hard to imagine how it would stretch back into infinity. We are learning that the nature of existence is such that it doesn't seem to like singularities and infinities. Such concepts are likely remnants of religious thought.

I find the theory of there being a finite number of "bubble" universes in a multiverse, with nothing much in between them, an amenable way of resolving these paradoxes. How these bubbles form, expand and contract is something perhaps beyond our understanding, but it makes slightly more sense when you imagine things this way.
 
The idea of a beginning of time itself seems absurd, but infinite past is also incomprehensible. I favor the latter. Perhaps our perception of time is incorrect.
 
Originally posted by Dissident Dan
The idea of a beginning of time itself seems absurd, but infinite past is also incomprehensible. I favor the latter. Perhaps our perception of time is incorrect.

Infinite time is a concept that is not worth exploring, but the idea of finite time by our standards serves the purpose of our vision of time quite well, and we need not be ashamed of this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K