Average chord length of a circle

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of the average chord length of a circle, exploring different methods for deriving this average. Participants present various mathematical approaches and definitions of "average," leading to differing results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes two methods for calculating the average chord length, one integrating over angles and the other over diameter, yielding different results: $$\frac{4R}{\pi}$$ and $$\frac{R\pi}{2}$$ respectively.
  • Another participant highlights that the definition of "average" can lead to different mathematical questions and answers, questioning the assumptions behind the calculations.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about whether the two methods yield the same average, suggesting that they are summing all possible chord lengths.
  • One participant argues that there is no unique way to sum over the infinite set of chords, using an analogy to illustrate the importance of integration methods.
  • Another participant challenges the analogy, suggesting that if the correct substitutions are made, the integrals could yield the same result.
  • A later reply clarifies that while there is one set of infinite chords, there are multiple ways to define the probability distribution, which can lead to different mean values.
  • One participant describes a method for obtaining a random chord by uniformly selecting two points on the circle, leading to a detailed calculation that ultimately supports the first method's result of $$\frac{4R}{\pi}$$.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the average chord length, as multiple competing views and methods are presented, leading to differing results and interpretations of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of definitions and methods of integration in determining the average chord length, indicating that assumptions about the distribution of chords and the integration process significantly affect the outcomes.

serverxeon
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
I would like to find the average chord length of a circle.
And I have 2 methods, which gave different answers...

[The chord is defined as the line joining 2 points on the circumference of the circle.]

Jrgbly6.png


The general formula for a chord length is ##d=2R\sin(\delta/2)=2\sqrt{R^2-u^2}##

Method 1: Integrate over angles
Avg length = $$\frac{\int_0^{2\pi} 2R\sin(\delta/2)\,d\delta}{2\pi}$$
$$=\frac{4R}{\pi}$$

Method 2: Integrate over diameter (-R to R)
Avg length = $$\frac{\int_{-R}^{R} 2\sqrt{R^2-u^2}\,du}{2R}$$
After simplification
$$\int_{-R}^{R} \sqrt{1-\left(\frac{u}{R}\right)^2}\,du$$
Then, using the fact
$$\int_{-Z}^{Z} \sqrt{1-\left(\frac{u}{Z}\right)^2}\,du = \frac{Z\pi}{2}$$
I get
$$=\frac{R\pi}{2}$$

So the answers from my 2 methods don't add up. Any things i might have overlooked?
 

Attachments

  • Jrgbly6.png
    Jrgbly6.png
    6.9 KB · Views: 4,524
Physics news on Phys.org
You found two different definitions for the average. The question "what do you average over?" is not just interesting for the calculation, it leads to different mathematical questions - with different answers.
 
I am not too sure. Are they not the same?
However, even if I ignore the different definition of average and solely look at the 'sum of all chords',

I get (for angles) ##8R## and (for diamater) ##R^2\pi##

Am I not simply summing up all possible chord lengths from 0, to 2R, then back to 0 again?
 
There is an infinite set of chords, there is no unique way to “sum” over them.

An analogy: Let ##a=b^2##. Clearly a=b has the solutions a=b=0 and a=b=1. But the integrals between these limits are different: $$\int_0^1 a da \neq \int_0^1 b^2 db$$
The key point here is ##da \neq db## - it matters how you integrate.
 
Your example is not exactly correct.
If you substituted $$a=b^2$$
then
$$\int_0^1 a\, da = \int_0^1 {b^2\cdot2b}\,db$$
which is then the same...

Anyway,
Did you mean to say there is ONE set of infinite chords, or there are infinite sets of finite chords?
Because you seem to suggest the former, and that would mean there should only be one unique answer?
 
There is one set of infinite chords. However, there are many possible ways to define the probability distribution. Your analysis uses two different ones, so it is not surprising to get two different answers for the mean.
 
serverxeon said:
which is then the same...
Yes, but you had to introduce the factor 2 b. That's the point. A change in coordinates can change the integral if you do not add factors like these.
 
The one true way to obtain a random chord, is to uniformly pick two points P,Q on the circle. These choices amounts to a uniform choice of angles \theta,\phi \in [0,2\pi). The angle POQ, where O is the center, is equal to \sqrt{2R^2-2R^2\cos(\theta-\phi)} = \sqrt{2}R\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta - \phi)} by the cosine formula (note that the sign of \theta - \phi does not matter here). The average length thus becomes

\frac{\int^{2\pi}_0 \int^{2\pi}_0 \sqrt{2}R\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta - \phi)}d\theta d \phi}{\int^{2\pi}_0 \int^{2\pi}_0 d\theta d\phi} = \frac{\int^{2\pi}_0 \int^{2\pi}_0 \sqrt{2}R\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta - \phi)}d\theta d \phi}{(2\pi)^2}

Evaluating the inner integral first, it is clear that as \phi varies as a constant, the integral remains unaffected. So
\int^{2\pi}_0\left( \int^{2\pi}_0 \sqrt{2}R\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta - \phi)}d\theta \right) d \phi = \int^{2\pi}_0\left( \int^{2\pi}_0 \sqrt{2}R\sqrt{1-\cos(\theta)}d\theta \right) d \phi
= 2\pi \sqrt{2}R \int^{2\pi}_0 \sqrt{1-\cos(\theta)}d\theta = 2\pi \sqrt{2}R \left( \int^{\pi}_0 \sqrt{1-\cos(\theta)}d\theta + \int^{\pi}_0 \sqrt{1+\cos(\theta)}d\theta \right)

On the last equality we split the integral in two, and used the fact that \cos(\theta + \pi) = -\cos(\theta). Next observe that 1-\cos(\theta) = 2\sin^2(\frac{\theta}{2}) and 1 + \cos(\theta) = 2\sin^2(\frac{\theta}{2}), so that \sqrt{1-\cos(\theta)} = \sqrt{2}\sin(\frac{\theta}{2}) and \sqrt{1+\cos(\theta)} = \sqrt{2}\cos(\frac{\theta}{2}) (note that both expressions to the right are positive since we now are integrating over \theta \in [0,\pi]!).

Our integral becomes

2\pi \sqrt{2}R \int^{\pi}_0 \sqrt{2}\left( \sin(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \cos(\frac{\theta}{2}) \right) d\theta = 4\pi R \int^{\pi}_0 \left( \sin(\frac{\theta}{2}) + \cos(\frac{\theta}{2}) \right)d\theta

This is easily evaluated, yielding 4\pi R[-2\cos(\frac{\theta}{2})+2\sin(\frac{\theta}{2})]^{\pi}_0 = 16 \pi R. By our first formula, we obtain the average length
\frac{16 \pi R}{(2\pi)^2} = \frac{4R}{\pi} which indeed was your first answer.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
538
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K