MHB Average "Hits" on exploding dice

  • Thread starter Thread starter kryshen1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average Dice
kryshen1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey folks,

I've been using a really simplistic equation for this and I'd like to get an actual table/equation/and standard deviations if possible.

Here are the rules.
roll xd6s (six-sided dice)
every die that rolls a 4 or greater is a "hit."
6s rolled count as a hit and then "explode," adding another die which is then rolled. That die hits on a 4+ and also explodes on 6s (this explosion chain can continue infinitely, theoretically).

What is the average number of hits for any value of x? Up til this point I've just assumed an average "hits per die" of 0.583 (50% of dice rolled "hit," 16.67% explode and of those 50% hit), but that only accounts for one explosion, not a 6 rolled into a 6 etc. For bonus points, how can I find the standard deviation for any given value of x?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kryshen said:
Hey folks,

I've been using a really simplistic equation for this and I'd like to get an actual table/equation/and standard deviations if possible.

Here are the rules.
roll xd6s (six-sided dice)
every die that rolls a 4 or greater is a "hit."
6s rolled count as a hit and then "explode," adding another die which is then rolled. That die hits on a 4+ and also explodes on 6s (this explosion chain can continue infinitely, theoretically).

What is the average number of hits for any value of x? Up til this point I've just assumed an average "hits per die" of 0.583 (50% of dice rolled "hit," 16.67% explode and of those 50% hit), but that only accounts for one explosion, not a 6 rolled into a 6 etc. For bonus points, how can I find the standard deviation for any given value of x?

Hi kryshen, welcome to MHB! ;)

Let's start with $x=1$, and let $E$ be the corresponding average number of hits (the so called Expectation).
Then on average we have $0$ hits with probability $\frac 36$, $1$ hit with probability $\frac 26$, and $1$ plus the as yet unknown $E$ number of hits with probability $\frac 16$, yes?

So:
$$E=0\cdot \frac 36 + 1\cdot \frac 26 + (1+E)\cdot \frac 16 = \frac 12 + \frac 16 E \\
\Rightarrow\quad \frac 56E=\frac 12 \quad\Rightarrow\quad E= \frac 35
$$
Now what would happen if we have $x$ dice that we throw completely independently from each other?
 
Thanks so much! Just to be clear, this means that the average number of hits on 10 dice would be 6. Inassumed that the numberbwould be hugher because of the dice explosions.

How would I find the standard deviation for any given value of x?
 
kryshen said:
Thanks so much! Just to be clear, this means that the average number of hits on 10 dice would be 6. Inassumed that the numberbwould be hugher because of the dice explosions.

How would I find the standard deviation for any given value of x?

Let the average number of hits of 1 dice be $\mu=\frac 35$, which is what we found earlier.
Then the square of the standard deviation $\sigma(\text{1 dice})$ is equal to the what the squared deviation of $\mu$ is on average:
$$\sigma^2(\text{1 dice)} = (0 - \mu)^2 \cdot \frac 36 + (1 - \mu)^2 \cdot \frac 26 + ((1+\mu)-\mu) \cdot \frac 16$$

And the standard deviation $\sigma(x\text{ dice})$ is:
$$\sigma(x\text{ dice}) = \sqrt{ x\cdot \sigma^2(\text{1 dice})}$$
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top