I Average magnetic moment of atom in magnetic field ##B##

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the average magnetic moment of an atom in a magnetic field using the canonical partition function. It aims to show that the average magnetic moment, denoted as ⟨μ⟩, can be expressed as ⟨μ⟩ = β⁻¹ (∂ log Z / ∂ B), where Z is the partition function for one atom. The average energy is related to the partition function by ⟨E⟩ = - (∂/∂β) log Z, and it is also linked to the magnetic moment by ⟨E⟩ = -⟨μ⟩ B. The challenge lies in finding the derivative ∂B/∂β to connect these results, while also clarifying the use of the symbol μ, which is reserved for chemical potential. The Feynman-Hellman theorem is suggested as a pathway to derive the desired relationship.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
from the partition function - am trying to show that ##\langle \mu \rangle = \beta^{-1} (\partial \log Z / \partial B)## where ##Z## is the canonical partition function for one atom, i.e. ##Z = \sum_{m=-j}^{j} \mathrm{exp}(\mu_0 \beta B m)##, and ##\mu = \mu_0 m##. The average energy:\begin{align*}
\langle E \rangle = - \frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \log Z
\end{align*}and ##\langle E \rangle = -\langle \mu \rangle B ##. How do I get the derivative ##\partial B/ \partial \beta## to link the two results? Or is there another way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you mean ##H_{\text{mag}}=-\vec{\mu}_{\text{mag}} \cdot \vec{B}## in the Hamiltonian; unfortunately ##\mu## is already reserved for the chemical potential of some charge or particle-number like conserved quantity (or quantities).

Then your formula follows from the Feynman-Hellman theorem as usual.
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K