Undergrad Average magnetic moment of atom in magnetic field ##B##

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the average magnetic moment of an atom in a magnetic field using the canonical partition function. It aims to show that the average magnetic moment, denoted as ⟨μ⟩, can be expressed as ⟨μ⟩ = β⁻¹ (∂ log Z / ∂ B), where Z is the partition function for one atom. The average energy is related to the partition function by ⟨E⟩ = - (∂/∂β) log Z, and it is also linked to the magnetic moment by ⟨E⟩ = -⟨μ⟩ B. The challenge lies in finding the derivative ∂B/∂β to connect these results, while also clarifying the use of the symbol μ, which is reserved for chemical potential. The Feynman-Hellman theorem is suggested as a pathway to derive the desired relationship.
ergospherical
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,387
from the partition function - am trying to show that ##\langle \mu \rangle = \beta^{-1} (\partial \log Z / \partial B)## where ##Z## is the canonical partition function for one atom, i.e. ##Z = \sum_{m=-j}^{j} \mathrm{exp}(\mu_0 \beta B m)##, and ##\mu = \mu_0 m##. The average energy:\begin{align*}
\langle E \rangle = - \frac{\partial}{\partial \beta} \log Z
\end{align*}and ##\langle E \rangle = -\langle \mu \rangle B ##. How do I get the derivative ##\partial B/ \partial \beta## to link the two results? Or is there another way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you mean ##H_{\text{mag}}=-\vec{\mu}_{\text{mag}} \cdot \vec{B}## in the Hamiltonian; unfortunately ##\mu## is already reserved for the chemical potential of some charge or particle-number like conserved quantity (or quantities).

Then your formula follows from the Feynman-Hellman theorem as usual.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K