I started my way through baby Rudin recently, been able to answer every question so far, but I just can't get #16 from Chapter 1.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I (think) understand the geometry of it perfectly. I just can't prove it rigorously/analytically. I haven't been able to do anything for 3 days now, except think about this problem. So any help would be appreciated.

Suppose [tex]k\geq 3, |\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}|=d>0,\text{ and }r>0[/tex]. Prove:

(a) If 2r>d, there are infinitely many [tex]\mathbf{z}\in\mathbb{R}^k[/tex] such that [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|=r[/tex].

I have:

Since [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|=r[/tex], then [tex]2r=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex]. Also, so [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|[/tex], so [tex]2r=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|=\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex]. By Rudin's Proposition 1.37(f), [tex]\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\right|\leq\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex] for any [tex]\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y},\mathbf{z}\in\mathbb{R}^{k}[/tex]. Since [tex]\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\right|=d[/tex], this proposition makes it is clear that, given [tex]\mathbf{x},\mathbf{y}\in\mathbb{R}^{k}[/tex], there exists infinitely many [tex]\mathbf{z}\in\mathbb{R}^{k}[/tex] satisfying the equations [tex]2r>d,\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|=r[/tex].

I'm not sure this is a valid proof, because it would hold in [tex]\mathbb{R}^2[/tex]. But if I'm imagining the geometry correctly, there should be exactly 2 solutions in 2-space (i.e., the 2 points at which the circles of radius r, drawn about [tex]\mathbf{x}[/tex] and [tex]\mathbf{y}[/tex], intersect), not infinitely many. So I'm sure I'm missing something, but I don't see any holes in the proof.

I've also observed that under 2-space, if you square these equations: [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=r,\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|=r[/tex] and apply the definition of norm, you get a system of two equations and two variables ([tex]z_1,z_2[/tex]). I know there's a solution there, which meshes perfectly with my understanding of the geometry behind this problem. Moreover, if you move on to 3-space and proceed in the same way, you get a system of two equations and three variables ([tex]z_1,z_2,z_3[/tex]). I know that this system will have infinitely many solutions. But I don't know how to prove rigorously that the 2-variable system is solvable or that the 3-variable system is unsolvable. Also, the way I understand the problem, r is fixed. But it is subject to some constraint (e.g., 2r>d). I don't know how to incorporate this constraint into the proof.

(b) If 2r=d, there is exactly one such [tex]\mathbf{z}[/tex].

I can't even figure out where to begin. I've noticed that if you set [tex]\mathbf{z}=\tfrac{1}{2}\left(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{y}\right)[/tex], then [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex]. Also, this makes [tex]2r=2\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=2\left|\tfrac{\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{y}}{2}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{y}-\mathbf{x}\right|=d[/tex].

I can derive this "solution" for [tex]\mathbf{z}[/tex] by squaring [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex] and going from there. But no relationship between 2r and d is needed to figure this out, so it would seem that [tex]\mathbf{z}=\tfrac{1}{2}\left(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{y}\right)[/tex] should be true in the cases of 2r>d and 2r<d. So I'm stuck on this one.

(c) If [tex]2r<d[/tex], there is no such [tex]\mathbf{z}[/tex].

This is the one I think I've made the most progress on. I think Rudin's Theorem 1.37(f) should apply. Let me know if this proof works/doesn't work:

Assume a solution does exist. Since [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|=r[/tex] and [tex]\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{x}\right|=\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|[/tex], then [tex]2r=\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex]. It's given that [tex]\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\right|=d[/tex], so if [tex]2r<d[/tex], then [tex]\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|<\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex]. But this contradicts Rudin's Theorem 1.37(f), which says that [tex]\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{z}\right|+\left|\mathbf{z}-\mathbf{y}\right|\geq\left|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\right|[/tex]. Therefore, no [tex]\mathbf{z}[/tex] exists.

Any input would be appreciated.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Baby Rudin problem driving me crazy

Loading...

Similar Threads - Baby Rudin problem | Date |
---|---|

Baby Rudin Proof | Aug 28, 2014 |

Baby Rudin Theorem 1.11 | Oct 20, 2013 |

Difference between theorems 2.12 & 214 of Baby Rudin | Aug 6, 2012 |

Baby rudin condensation points | Jun 11, 2012 |

Baby Rudin Proof of Theorem 1.33 (e) - Triangle Inequality | Jun 7, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**