Bachelor's in Physics: Employability and Prospects

  • Thread starter Thread starter Necross
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the employability and prospects of obtaining a bachelor's degree in physics, particularly in comparison to engineering fields. Participants explore questions regarding job market statistics, salary expectations, graduate school admission challenges, and the overall value of a physics degree in the workforce.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about switching from Mechatronics Engineering to physics, questioning the employability of a physics degree and seeking salary statistics.
  • Another participant suggests that physics is harder than mechanical engineering and implies that job prospects for physics graduates are poor.
  • A participant mentions that while physics is not a professional degree, the skills developed in a physics program are valued by employers, emphasizing the need for effective self-marketing.
  • Concerns are raised about the competitiveness of graduate school admissions, with a suggestion that a B average may be necessary but not sufficient for acceptance.
  • Discussion includes the difficulty of securing tenure-track faculty positions in physics, highlighting the need for research progress, funding acquisition, and teaching aptitude.
  • One participant notes that engineering graduates typically have more design experience, which may be advantageous in the job market.
  • Another participant shares that some engineering jobs may consider physics graduates, but advancement often requires a Professional Engineer license.
  • There is a sentiment that success in physics is correlated with a genuine passion for the subject.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express mixed views on the employability of physics graduates, with some suggesting poor prospects while others highlight the transferable skills gained. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the comparative difficulty of physics versus engineering and the specific challenges faced in securing employment or graduate school admission.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various academic requirements and job market conditions, but there are no definitive conclusions drawn about the overall employability of physics graduates or the necessary qualifications for graduate school.

Necross
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have a couple of questions. Currently I'm a second year Mechatronics Engineering student at the University of Waterloo in Canada and I'm doing horrible. It's the more technical courses that are constantly screwing me up so I've decided to switch into physics. Now I've read the "So you want to be a physicist" sticky and have done some research. My academic advisors have also advised me to switch into physics. I've always had a passion for physics especially astrophysics and cosmology and I got a 95% on an astronomy course that I took as an elective. I understand that many of you here are physicists or can give out some advice regarding the field. My first question here is that what is a bachelors in physics worth in terms of employability and statistics? Does anyone know of any salary statistics? Now I know that people here will tell me not to go into the sciences for money and believe me I know! I've had two co-op terms as a researcher and I absolutely loved them! But I do need to support my aging parents. Also what are the prospects for graduate school? Is it hard to get into? Is it hard to land a faculty position? Do you need to be especially bright and have your marks over 85-90% all the time? How employable is an astrophysicist or a cosmologist?

- Thanks
- Necross
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Necross said:
I have a couple of questions. Currently I'm a second year Mechatronics Engineering student at the University of Waterloo in Canada and I'm doing horrible. It's the more technical courses that are constantly screwing me up so I've decided to switch into physics. Now I've read the "So you want to be a physicist" sticky and have done some research. My academic advisors have also advised me to switch into physics. I've always had a passion for physics especially astrophysics and cosmology and I got a 95% on an astronomy course that I took as an elective. I understand that many of you here are physicists or can give out some advice regarding the field. My first question here is that what is a bachelors in physics worth in terms of employability and statistics? Does anyone know of any salary statistics? Now I know that people here will tell me not to go into the sciences for money and believe me I know! I've had two co-op terms as a researcher and I absolutely loved them! But I do need to support my aging parents. Also what are the prospects for graduate school? Is it hard to get into? Is it hard to land a faculty position? Do you need to be especially bright and have your marks over 85-90% all the time? How employable is an astrophysicist or a cosmologist?

- Thanks
- Necross

If you can't handle mechanical engineering, how do you intend to handle physics? Last I heard, physics was way harder than mechanical engineering. For a bachelor, the prospects are pretty bad. Even PhDs won't find related work. You don't need 85+ all the time, but As will get you into good schools which will more likely get you good work. Its one of the reasons I'm strongly considering quitting physics.
 
Last edited:
Its not mechanical but mechatronics which is basically electrical +mechanical+computer. Damn :S didn't know it was that bad. Is it really that hard? :S
 
Necross said:
Its not mechanical but mechatronics which is basically electrical +mechanical+computer. Damn :S didn't know it was that bad. Is it really that hard? :S

I found Engineering to be a joke next to physics.
 
Now I'm honestly being scared. Part of the reason why I'm doing horrible is because on average i studied about 10 hours for each course through the entire term.
 
Necross said:
Its not mechanical but mechatronics which is basically electrical +mechanical+computer. Damn :S didn't know it was that bad. Is it really that hard? :S

You'll have a better chance in getting a job in Mechatronics then finding a job with an Undergraduate Degree in Physics.

Necross said:
Now I'm honestly being scared. Part of the reason why I'm doing horrible is because on average i studied about 10 hours for each course through the entire term.

You're not alone on this one.
 
Let me rephrase the question. I know that the employment prospect for a physics undergrad are not good. But what about a Phd? I don't want to be rich. I just want to be able to support my family and live comfortably while doing what I love which is basically research in physics.
 
Necross said:
My first question here is that what is a bachelors in physics worth in terms of employability and statistics? Does anyone know of any salary statistics?
The difference between physics and the various branches of engineering is that physics is not a professional degree. As a result there are significantly less positions open that specifically seek a "physicist" or "physics major." But the truth of the matter is that the skill set one develops in a physics program is highly sought after by many employers. You just have to figure out how to best market yourself.

Here's some hard data:
https://www.cap.ca/careers/home/employmentprospects.html


Necross said:
Also what are the prospects for graduate school? Is it hard to get into? Is it hard to land a faculty position? Do you need to be especially bright and have your marks over 85-90% all the time? How employable is an astrophysicist or a cosmologist?

To get into grad school you need to meet the academic requirements of first the university's department of graduate studies and then the requirements of the physics department. Some programs are more competative than others, and so meeting the minimum requirements doesn't always guarantee you a spot. In general we're talking at least a B average just to get in.

Tenure track faculty positions are highly competative - especially in the theoretical branches. Not only do you need to be able to demonstrate significant progress in research, you also have to show that you are capable of acquiring external funding and teaching apptitude.

I personally think success in this field is strongly correlated with how much a person enjoys the study of physics.
 
If you look on Monster/Career-Builder, you will see that there are a few design jobs looking for engineers that will also consider physicists. The problem comes when you want to advance in your field and a PE license is required (Professional Engineer).

The nice thing about engineering is that you will graduate with a good amount of design experience rather than just science. My school (UMass) differentiates between engineering science credits and engineering design credits - and requires a minimum of each. You also get the business angle of science and design by doing engineering - and that's the angle that most employers demand.

Lots of similarities - you will need that same mathematics sequence for engineering that you do for a physics degree (along with specialized statistics courses in either the physics department or engineering department). You will also need a battery of general education coursework.

I can't help you out with the difficulty of one vs the other because I'm a sophomore in engineering interested in physics on the side (but only having completed I & II so far). I can tell you that at my school you will be taking 4-5 engineering courses at once in your junior/senior year, but only 3 physics classes at a time during that period. Looking at texts from those classes, I'd have to say that the Physics classes look more intense, but not twice or three times as intense. Given the fact that you will be taking more engineering classes than physics classes - I would have to gauge that they are at least equally difficult. At my school, many of the engineers who burn-out either go into the business department or into physics/chemistry. You can read that as you will.

Good luck though - it's tough, but gratifying.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K