- 2,714
- 11,914
. ...u have to be kidding me ! HOW COULD IT TAKE SO LONG FOR PEOPLE TO REALISE THIS !BillTre said:
I think its satireDrakkith said:Hmmm. I'm not convinced it's not purposely written to appear completely uneducated.
If that's the case, it should have gone into a joke thread.Drakkith said:Hmmm. I'm not convinced it's not purposely written to appear completely uneducated.
Agreed...but maybe this is not just a joke maybe the uploader is assembleing a group of wise intelectuals like us to find out something...to uncovrr a secret so grave no one knows...i guessBillTre said:If that's the case, it should have gone into a joke thread.
Navin said:. ...u have to be kidding me ! HOW COULD IT TAKE SO LONG FOR PEOPLE TO REALISE THIS !
Pffff...Einstein knew this !

There should be a law, here, and I'm sure I've said it before, that there should not be allowed, more than a "double-negative", in a post, as they get my head spinning, wildly.Drakkith said:Hmmm. I'm not convinced it's not purposely written to appear completely uneducated.
Drak-2_nots said:Hmmm. I'm convinced it's purposely written to appear completely uneducated.

OmCheeto said:There should be a law, here, and I'm sure I've said it before, that there should not be allowed, more than a "double-negative", in a post, as they get my head spinning, wildly.
Wait! Negating the "nots", was not that difficult.
No!Drakkith said:I ain't never not paid attention to no 'double-negative' nonsense before! And I ain't startin' now!
On the other hand, I have met some people who had some incredibly weird (including stupid) ideas.Drakkith said:Hmmm. I'm not convinced it's not purposely written to appear completely uneducated.
BillTre said:I guess there is no way to distinguish between the two without more data.
Satire or Real?
Poe's law is an adage of Internet culture stating that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, it is impossible to create a parody of extreme views so obviously exaggerated that it cannot be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of the parodied views.
OmCheeto said:There should be a law, here, and I'm sure I've said it before, that there should not be allowed, more than a "double-negative", in a post, as they get my head spinning, wildly.
compuserve Instructions said:If you don't want to not uninstall the current instance of cserv.exe, type "Yes" or "Y".
No need to, it just converted the present one!BillTre said:If that's the case, it should have gone into a joke thread.
Also confused by double by double negatives, (Alan Greenspan did a funny extension “ I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant”)POEs law talks about creationism as a good example and below is an illustration of that.Difficult to tell first viewing if they are serious or not.Same with the OP, I think it’s a joke (95% certain) perhaps the editor wasn’t sure?Drakkith said:You better believe it. It's a bit like Poe's law: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe's_law