Baker, Campbell, Hausdorff and all that

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lbrits
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula, particularly its integral representation involving matrices A and B. Participants explore proofs, interpretations of the delta function in the context of integration, and related mathematical identities, with connections to perturbation theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an elegant proof of the integral representation of the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula, noting that their own proof is messy.
  • Another participant questions the meaning of the integral involving the delta function, particularly at the singularity point, and discusses the implications of limits of integration.
  • A third participant provides an example related to the differentiation of the matrix exponential, suggesting a shorthand notation that extends beyond the singular point.
  • A later post claims to have identified the correct identity for the formula, asserting that it is easier to prove than initially thought.
  • One participant shares a link to a solution for those interested, attributing assistance to a friend.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and curiosity about the integral representation and the delta function, but no consensus is reached on the proof or interpretation of the formula. Multiple viewpoints and interpretations remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the complexity of the proof and the challenges posed by the delta function's singularity, indicating that the discussion may depend on specific mathematical definitions and assumptions that are not fully resolved.

lbrits
Messages
410
Reaction score
3
[SOLVED] Baker, Campbell, Hausdorff and all that

I'm posting this here because, although it is a mathematics problem, it is related to perturbation theory and is the kind of problem physicists might be more skilled at answering.

Does anyone know an elegant proof of

e^{A+B} = \int_0^1 d\alpha_1 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1) e^{\alpha_1 A} + \int_0^1 d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1 - \alpha_2) e^{\alpha_1 A} B e^{\alpha_2 A} + \frac{1}{2!}\int_0^1 d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1 - \alpha_2 - \alpha_3) e^{\alpha_1 A} B e^{\alpha_2 A} B e^{\alpha_3 A} + \dots

where of course A and B are matrices? I can prove it starting from the easy to prove identity
\frac{d}{ds} e^{A + s B} = \left( \int_0^1\!dt\, e^{t(A + s B)} B e^{-t(A + s B)} \right) e^{A + s B}
but the proof gets a bit messy. I was hoping maybe someone recognizes the formula or knows a good references.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't help with your question but I'm curious. What does

\int_0^1 d\alpha_1 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1) e^{\alpha_1 A}

mean?

That is, since

\int_0^{1+\epsilon} d\alpha_1 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1) e^{\alpha_1 A}=e^A and \int_0^{1-\epsilon} d\alpha_1 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1) e^{\alpha_1 A}=0

what happens when your limit of integration over a delta function is the singularity point?
 
I'll give an example, based on (a more general version of) the second identity I gave. You can think of
\frac{d}{ds} \left( e^{A(s)} \right) = \int_0^1\int_0^1 \!d\alpha_1\,d\alpha_2 \delta(1-\alpha_1 - \alpha_2) e^{\alpha_1 A(s)} A'(s) e^{\alpha_2 A(s)}
as short-hand for
\frac{d}{ds} \left( e^{A(s)} \right) = \int_0^1\!d\alpha\,e^{\alpha A(s)} A'(s) e^{(1-\alpha)A(s)}.
This the range of integration extends slightly beyond the singular point, in order that the short-hand works.
 
I think I understand that. Thanks!
 
In case anyone is following the score, the correct identity turns out to be

e^{A+B} = \int_0^1 d\alpha_1 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1) e^{\alpha_1 A} + \int_0^1 d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1 - \alpha_2) e^{\alpha_1 A} B e^{\alpha_2 A} + \int_0^1 d\alpha_1 d\alpha_2 d\alpha_3 \,\delta(1-\alpha_1 - \alpha_2 - \alpha_3) e^{\alpha_1 A} B e^{\alpha_2 A} B e^{\alpha_3 A} + \dots

which is considerably easier to prove =)
 
For anyone who cares for the solution, I've posted it here:
http://www.mathematics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Linear_algebra/Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff_formula/integral_expansion_proof
Thanks to my friend Kory for his assistance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
28K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K