Balanced forces - Electrical and Gravitational forces

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the balance of electrical and gravitational forces between two objects of equal mass and charge. The original poster is trying to determine the mass required for these forces to cancel each other out, given the equations for gravitational and electrical forces.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to equate the gravitational and electrical forces and solve for mass. Some participants question the validity of the calculations and the assumptions made regarding the forces involved.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's calculations, suggesting that there may be errors in the numerical substitutions or interpretations of the results. There is a focus on clarifying the setup and ensuring that all relevant information is shared for accurate analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the mass values used and the specific case of protons versus electrons, which may affect the interpretation of the results. The original poster's initial assumption about the mass being small is also questioned in light of the context.

hhhp8cec1
Messages
7
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Lets say I have two objects, with the same mass, m, and charge (+q), with a distance r between them. They repel each other due to electrical force, but they are attracted due to gravitational force.

My questions is: What should be their mass m such that they feel no net force?

Homework Equations


F (g) = GMm/r^2
F(e) = k q1q1/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


F(g) = F(e)
kq^2/r^2 = Gm^2 / r^2

Im getting a really small number when solving m = sqrt (k(q^2)/ g).
Is this a trick question ?
When taking the ratio of F(e)/F(g) I see that the electrical force is much stronger than Fg.

Thank you [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you get, and what did you use as charge?
hhhp8cec1 said:
When taking the ratio of F(e)/F(g) I see that the electrical force is much stronger than Fg.
That ratio should be 1 if your numbers are right.
 
hhhp8cec1 said:
Is this a trick question ?
Regardless of the question, you had two equations and found what you believed was the solution of those equations, but on plugging the numbers back in it does not seem to be a solution after all. So you made a mistake either in obtaining the solution or in checking it.
Please post your working.
 
hhhp8cec1 said:
When taking the ratio of F(e)/F(g) I see that the electrical force is much stronger than Fg.
That's because your answer is wrong. You have not posted any of the actual work or actual numbers or your answer, so how are we supposed to see where you went wrong?
 
You seem to setup and solve the equation correctly, but you must have done somewhere a mistake when replacing the quantities involved with real numbers and doing the arithmetic operations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: lekh2003
Sorry for the lack of information. This is how I solved this question:
IMAG0229.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0229.jpg
    IMAG0229.jpg
    30.2 KB · Views: 832
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
hhhp8cec1 said:
Sorry for the lack of information. This is how I solved this question:View attachment 218311
I make it slightly more, 1.85x10-9kg. But you have not shown the rest of your calculation, where you find that Fg is much less than Fe.
 
Yes, in scientific mode I get the same result, 1.85 x 10 ^-9.

What got me confused was this explanation:
http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/physics/phynet/e&m/electrostatics/michaels_question.htm

"So, in fact, we have answered the original question - there is no distance at all at which the gravitational force between two electrons balances the electric force between them!"

But in this question, they referred to 2 protons/electrons, so that is a different case... When using the result 1.85x10^-9 and solving for the ratio I get 1, cool = ]

Thank you for your help
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
hhhp8cec1 said:
What got me confused was this explanation:
You originally considered the answer 1.85x10-9 kg as tiny, but you did not say you were dealing with electrons. In those terms, that mass is huge, over 1021 electron masses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
822
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K