Ballentine's (3.49) and (3.50)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter andresB
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical equations presented in Ballentine's quantum mechanics texts (3.49 and 3.50), specifically the formulae involving velocity space and their implications. The equation e^{i v \cdot G}Ve^{-i v \cdot G}=V-vI is derived similarly to the canonical commutation relations for position and momentum, indicating a parallel structure in quantum mechanics. Additionally, the compatibility of the operators [G_\alpha,Q_\beta]=0 is established, confirming that instantaneous transformations do not affect position due to the nature of velocity and time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly operator theory.
  • Familiarity with the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics, including commutation relations.
  • Knowledge of velocity space concepts in quantum contexts.
  • Basic grasp of transformations in quantum systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the equation e^{i v \cdot G}Ve^{-i v \cdot G}=V-vI in detail.
  • Explore the implications of operator compatibility in quantum mechanics.
  • Research the role of velocity space in quantum theory.
  • Examine the canonical commutation relations and their applications in quantum mechanics.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum physicists, advanced students of quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory will benefit from this discussion.

andresB
Messages
627
Reaction score
375
Those equation seems to not be derived anywhere but just stated without proof, are they postulated or one can prove them?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, they aren't derived from any other equation but they aren't postulated. They are natural, as the author explains.
The formula ## e^{i v \cdot G}Ve^{-i v \cdot G}=V-vI## is just derived in the same way as for Q and P. They are very similar, just here you have velocity space instead of ordinary space.
About the formula ## [G_\alpha,Q_\beta]=0##, its just as simple as what the author says:
the position will be unaffected by the instantaneous transformation
Because velocity changes position only by the passage of time. So there will be no change at the instant of transformation. Also changing the position of the particle doesn't change its velocity directly.So the two operators are compatible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
6K