Bartlett's paper on improving elementary calculus teaching was reviewed in Mathematics Magazine, highlighting the need for clearer notation in calculus. The reviewer acknowledged Bartlett's argument for a transparent approach to differentials but expressed concerns about the potential confusion of the proposed formula. The discussion emphasizes the importance of effective communication in mathematics education, particularly regarding notation that aids student understanding.
PREREQUISITESMathematics educators, curriculum developers, and anyone involved in teaching or learning calculus who seeks to improve clarity and effectiveness in mathematical communication.
Walter Bradley Center Fellow Jonathan Bartlett’s paper on fixing long-standing flaws in the teaching of elementary calculus was recently reviewed in Mathematics Magazine.
Bartlett (above left, with his recent book, Calculus from the Ground Up), is delighted that math professionals want to evaluate proposed changes in teaching practice. He tells us, “The review was mixed, but most importantly the reviewer didn’t disagree with the results, only their potential usefulness. Final sentence: ‘The authors make a strong case for a clear and honest notation that facilitates working with differentials, but the formula above is probably just as confusing for students as the shorthand expression.’”