1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Basic knematics question i just cant get right

  1. May 30, 2008 #1
    A car travelling ate velocity V starts to accelerate, in its 4th second of acceleration it passes 18m(ie during the 4th second, not after 4 seconds), in its 5th second it passes 22m , assuming the acceleration a is constant(stays the same) throughout what was the starting velocity V? how do i solve this



    what i did was say,

    a=delta v/delta t,

    since a is constant and he passed 18 m in the 4th second(ie from t3-t4) and 22 in the 5th i conclude
    v(t=3.5)= 18m/s
    v(t=4.5)= 22m/s
    =>delta v=4m/s
    delta t = 1s
    =>a=4m/s^2

    the using V(t)=Vo+at
    V(3.5)=Vo+4*3.5
    =>18=Vo+14
    =>Vo=4

    is this a correct calculation or am i doing something wrong somewhere?

    the whole question is in kinematics and there are no other forces afecting the car.

    the answer in the book says Vo=0m/s and i cannot figure out how they got to that, it might be a mistake
     
  2. jcsd
  3. May 30, 2008 #2
    This part seems to be wrong. Think about this...

    I start accelerating from zero velocity and cover 10 meters in one second..does this mean my initial velocity v(t=0) is 10 m/s?
    (No, because v(t=0)=0 since I started from rest)

    Now try the question again..
     
  4. May 30, 2008 #3
    that i understand, but it does mean that your average velocity is 5, does it not, and thats why i said that the average velocity during the 4th second was 18, or in other words, since v is constant that the velocity exactly between the beginning and the end of the fourth second was 18.

    do you see any other way to solve this and get a Vo of 0??
     
  5. May 30, 2008 #4

    tiny-tim

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Welcome to PF!

    Hi devanlevin! Welcome to PF! :smile:

    Yes, that seems fine!

    But either the question is badly worded, or you've read it wrong.

    If it reads "in its 5th second of acceleration it passes 18m(ie during the 5th second, not after 4 seconds), in its 6th second it passes 22m", then Vo is 0! :smile:
     
  6. May 30, 2008 #5
    ok you used t= 3.5 s. Then its fine. I missed it last time.

    yeah i don't see any problems now
     
  7. May 30, 2008 #6
    cant get it right, even using your equations still dont get Vo=0, think its a problem in the book??
     
  8. May 30, 2008 #7
    * it's a matter of concepts.


    in its 4th second of acceleration it passes 18m(ie during the 4th second, not after 4 seconds)

    velocity at this instant is therefore 18 m/s

    in its 5th second it passes 22m

    velocity at this instant is 22 m/s

    in 1 sec, there is a change of velocity from 18 m/s to 22m/s. what is the acceleration?

    using v = u + at

    u = v - at

    pick either velocity and its corresponding time and the acceleration you just calculated to get the initial velocity, u.
     
  9. May 31, 2008 #8
    which problem are you talking about?
    The answer to your problem is given as v0=0?
     
  10. May 31, 2008 #9
    Ok, my idea is this:

    Set up two equations

    d1 = V0*t1 + 1/2*a*(t1)^2
    and
    d2= V0*t2 + 1/2*a*(t2)^2


    Now time one and time two are given (4s and 5s) and distance one and distance two are given as well(18m and 22m)

    Therefore, we now have two equations in two variables which should not be a problem to solve. Please correct me if i'm wrong.
     
  11. May 31, 2008 #10
    yes this would be the general method...
    but i cant see anything wrong with his method..
    taking averages is fine because velocity is linearly varying with time in this case
     
  12. May 31, 2008 #11
    I didn't say his method was wrong, i just made a suggestion :)
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: Basic knematics question i just cant get right
Loading...