Basic Quantum Transport Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter carbon9
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum Transport
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a confusion regarding the current calculation in nanotransistors as presented in Datta's "Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor." The MATLAB code provided calculates current using a factor of q^2/hbar, while the book's formulas display a factor of q/hbar. This discrepancy raises questions about the correct interpretation of the equations. Additionally, the MATLAB implementation requires energy values in electron volts, necessitating conversion to Joules for consistency with SI units. Clarification on this calculation method is sought to resolve the confusion.
carbon9
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi dears,

I'm following the book of Datta named "Quantum Transport: Atom to Transistor". But just at the beginning, I'm confused a bit;)

In the book, at chapter 1, there are some equations given for the current in nanotransistors, for example, an equation for a system with density of states D(E) sandwiched between contacts having Fermi functions f1(E) and f2(E) is given by shown in the attachement.

In order to make some calculations, author have given MATLAB files to calculate these formulas. In all of the formulas, current is calculated as:

for iV=1:IV
mu1=ep+VV(iV);
mu2=mu1;
f1=1./(1+exp((E-mu1)/kT1));
f2=1./(1+exp((E-mu2)/kT2));
D=(g./(2*pi))./(((E-ep).^2)+((g./2).^2));
D=D./(dE*sum(D));
I(iV)=dE*2*I0*(sum(D.*(f1-f2).*g1.*g2./g));
end

where

hbar=1.055e-34;
q=1.602e-19;
I0=q*q/hbar;

So, as I understand, he calculates the formula in MATLAB as if the multiply factor of the formula is q^2/hbar not q/hbar. But in the book, all current formulas have q/hbar in front of them.

Could you please give any idea on this?

With regards,
 

Attachments

  • datta.jpg
    datta.jpg
    6.6 KB · Views: 369
Physics news on Phys.org
In his MATLAB codes he likes to use energy in units of electron volts [ eV ]

And he sweeps the energy values while calculating current, but since everything else is in SI units, he needs to convert back to Joules which is simply done by multiplying by an extra factor of q.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K