Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation

In summary: If they are clusters, what does (c_1,c_2,...c_k) mean?To decompose the expression, you would use Bayes rule, but it is unclear what the expression is supposed to represent. In summary, the speaker is seeking help with modeling a hierarchical evaluation in a Bayesian framework for finding similar documents in a large library. They explain their current approach of using two phases of similarity analysis and provide a formula for representing the evaluation as a posterior probability expression. However, they are unsure how to decompose this expression and are seeking clarification on the variables and events involved. They also mention their interest in using a Bayesian approach for optimizing their procedures.
  • #1
hemanthk
2
0
Hi

I have a problem in which I have to search a huge library in order to find documents similar to that of a given query document.

The library is organised into clusters and each cluster contains documents of a particular class.

Given a query document, first we retrieve the most similar clusters and then find the most similar documents among the retrieved clusters.

Now my question is, how do we model this hierarchical evaluation in a bayesian framework ? (Assuming we already have the retrieval methods in place) We just need a framework to probabilistically represent this hierarchical search.

I just need a starting point or an example (a research paper, textbook, etc)...

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hemanthk said:
how do we model this hierarchical evaluation in a bayesian framework ? (Assuming we already have the retrieval methods in place) We just need a framework to probabilistically represent this hierarchical search.

When I think of modeling such a situation, I think of writing a simulation for it. Writing simulations can can involve computing conditional probabilities by Bayes rule, but I wouldn't call that a "Bayesian framework". I don' t know what it would mean to have a Bayesian framework for a simulation.

I think of a Bayesian framework as an approach to problems of statistical estimation or inference.

In the field of artificial intelligence, there are types of learning algorithms that are called Bayesian.

If you already have your procedures in place and you want to simulate them at work, I think you are just asking about how to create a simulation.

If you are trying to optimize your procedures by using a statistical decision method then it makes sense to ask about a Bayesian approach.

I think you should clarify which situation you're asking about.
 
  • #3
Hi Stephen,

Thank for your reply. Actually, its not a simulation that I want to do.
However as you said, I would like to perform my two level similarity evaluation and denote the result as a posterior (conditional probability representation).

I ll explain briefly.

Lets say the query document is D_q , there is a library of documents organised into k clusters (c_1 ... c_k). Let the total number of documents in the library (in all clusters) be N.

Now, we have to find a document in the library (k clusters) most similar to the query D_q.
We do it in two phases:
Phase I: Perform a similarity analysis of D_q with each of the k clusters and find some number of most similar clusters. Let us denote the set of these clusters as C_s.
(Now the search space is boiled down to C_s - a small part of the huge library)
Phase II: Perform a similarity analysis of D_q with each document of each cluster in the set C_s.
Finally, we have a list of N similarities corresponding to all the N documents in the library.
The non-zero similarity values are the ones corresponding to the documents of C_s.
And all the other documents are given zero similarity since they did not even qualify in the first level of analysis.

This is the way we are doing stuff right now.
Now what we want is to represent this evaluation as a similarity posterior over all the documents in the library given the clusters forming the library:

For i=1 to N
p(D_q~i/c_1,c_2,...c_k)=...

The crux of my problem is here: How to decompose this posterior probability expression such that it corresponds to what I do as explained above ? I thought this might be done using bayes rule but am not sure how!

I hope I made myself clear and if I did not, I am ready to explain further more.

Thank you
 
  • #4
hemanthk said:
p(D_q~i/c_1,c_2,...c_k)=...

It isn't clear what that means.

Does "D_q ~ i " refer to a yes-or-no random variable that says document D_q is (or is not) similar to document i ? Or does D_q refer to a real number that measures similarity? -or a vector of numbers?

What event does "c1,c_2,...c_k" denote? I thought the c_i were clusters, not events.
 
  • #5


I can understand the challenge you are facing in finding a Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation in your document search problem. There are various approaches that can be used to model hierarchical evaluation in a Bayesian framework. One possible approach could be to use a hierarchical Bayesian model, which is a statistical model that allows for the incorporation of hierarchical structure in the data.

In this case, the documents can be considered as the lowest level of the hierarchy, while the clusters can be considered as the higher level. The model would then estimate the probability of a document belonging to a particular cluster, taking into account the hierarchical structure of the data.

There are various research papers and textbooks that discuss hierarchical Bayesian models in detail, and I would recommend looking into those for a deeper understanding. Some examples include "Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling" by Andrew Gelman, "Bayesian Data Analysis" by Andrew Gelman et al., and "Bayesian Data Analysis in Ecology Using Linear Models with R, BUGS, and STAN" by Andrew Gelman et al.

Additionally, there may be specific papers or studies that have used Bayesian models for hierarchical evaluation in document search tasks. I would suggest doing a literature search to see if there are any relevant studies that could provide insights or a starting point for your problem.

Overall, modeling hierarchical evaluation in a Bayesian framework can be a complex task, and it may require some experimentation and fine-tuning to find the most suitable approach for your specific problem. I wish you the best of luck in your research and am happy to provide further assistance if needed.
 

1. What is a Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation?

A Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation is a statistical model that allows for the incorporation of prior knowledge or beliefs into the analysis. It uses Bayes' theorem to update the prior beliefs based on new evidence, resulting in a posterior distribution that represents the updated beliefs.

2. How does a Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation differ from other statistical models?

Unlike traditional statistical models, which rely solely on observed data, a Bayesian model incorporates prior knowledge or beliefs into the analysis. This allows for more accurate and robust predictions, especially in situations with limited data.

3. What are the benefits of using a Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation?

One of the main benefits of using a Bayesian model is its ability to incorporate prior knowledge, resulting in more accurate and reliable predictions. It also allows for the inclusion of uncertainty in the analysis, providing a more realistic representation of the data.

4. What are some common applications of Bayesian models for hierarchical evaluation?

Bayesian models for hierarchical evaluation are commonly used in fields such as finance, economics, and social sciences, where there is a need to incorporate prior knowledge or beliefs into the analysis. They are also used in machine learning, data mining, and decision-making processes.

5. Are there any limitations to using a Bayesian model for hierarchical evaluation?

One limitation is the need to specify a prior distribution, which can be subjective and may vary among individuals. Additionally, Bayesian models can be computationally intensive and may require advanced statistical knowledge to implement and interpret accurately.

Similar threads

  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
7
Views
446
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
704
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top