Which interpretation of probability is better for testing scientific hypotheses, and for scientific modeling in general: Bayesianism or frequentism, and why?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Bayesianism vs frequentism: which one is better for science?

Loading...

Similar Threads for Bayesianism frequentism better | Date |
---|---|

B Probabilities associated with temporal uncertainty | Jun 27, 2017 |

I Yet another Bayesian probability question | Jul 16, 2016 |

Bayesian estimation via MCMC | Dec 15, 2015 |

B Regarding bayesian analysis/inference/ predictions | Aug 28, 2015 |

Why are normal distributions so frequent? | Feb 23, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**