Before Big Bang: Life Before Creation

  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the existence of living organisms before and after the Big Bang, exploring the relationship between the Big Bang theory, abiogenesis, and evolutionary theory. Participants question how life could arise if nothing existed prior to the Big Bang and whether these concepts are interconnected or separate.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that nothing existed before the Big Bang, questioning the premise of living organisms existing prior to it.
  • Others argue that evolution cannot be discussed without acknowledging that life must have originated from something, not "nothing."
  • A few participants emphasize that the Big Bang theory and evolutionary theory address different aspects of existence and are not contradictory.
  • There are mentions of abiogenesis as a necessary concept to understand how life could arise after the Big Bang.
  • Some participants highlight that the conditions of the early universe were not conducive to life, suggesting a timeline where the Big Bang precedes abiogenesis and evolution.
  • Several replies challenge the understanding of the theories involved, suggesting that a clearer grasp of the Big Bang and abiogenesis is needed to engage in the discussion effectively.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the relationship between the Big Bang and the emergence of life, with some asserting that they are separate topics while others see a connection. The discussion remains unresolved regarding how life could exist after the Big Bang if nothing existed before it.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the definitions of "nothing," the timeline of events, and the conditions necessary for life to form. The relationship between the Big Bang, abiogenesis, and evolution is complex and not fully explored in the replies.

epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
What type of living organisms were there?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Nothing existed before the Big Bang. How could there be any living organisms? Are you talking about the Cambrian explosion instead?
 
How did we reproduce/evolve from nothing...
 
epkid08 said:
How did we reproduce/evolve from nothing...

We didn't evolve from "nothing"...we most certainly evolved from something. :rolleyes:

This topic sounds earily familiar to another thread we had a little while ago where someone was trying to connect the Big Bang to evolution of life. As we asserted over and over in that thread, the BB and evolution are separate topics that have nothing to do with each other.
 
Of course they're different theories, but they're the most accepted theories in their field, yet they contradict each other.
 
How do they contradict each other?
The theories discuss two quite different things.
Note that it is possible to have a universe that will not support life or for that matter sun and planet formation.
Since this particular universe has a structure that can support life the discussion of the evolution of life is meaningful.
In some universe structured differently it would not be.
 
NoTime said:
How do they contradict each other?

If there were no living organisms before the big bang, how are there living organisms after? How did we evolve from something that wasn't there?

NoTime said:
The theories discuss two quite different things.
Note that it is possible to have a universe that will not support life or for that matter sun and planet formation.
Since this particular universe has a structure that can support life the discussion of the evolution of life is meaningful.
In some universe structured differently it would not be.

Okay, I'm not quite sure what your point is here. Both theories are accepted for our universe.
 
epkid08 said:
If there were no living organisms before the big bang, how are there living organisms after? How did we evolve from something that wasn't there?

Okay, I'm not quite sure what your point is here. Both theories are accepted for our universe.

I suggest you actually read the Big Bang theory.

It took a while for the Universe to cool enough to form matter as we know it.
So even in this universe there were no living organisms for quite some time after the big bang.
 
BoomBoom said:
This topic sounds earily familiar to another thread we had a little while ago where someone was trying to connect the Big Bang to evolution of life. As we asserted over and over in that thread, the BB and evolution are separate topics that have nothing to do with each other.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=242954"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
epkid08 said:
If there were no living organisms before the big bang, how are there living organisms after? How did we evolve from something that wasn't there?

Evolutionary theory has NOTHING to do with how the universe was created or how life began (two things that happened VERY LONG times apart from one another as well), it only addresses how organisms have changed AFTER life came to exist. The Big Bang theory addresses how the non-living universe started. They are not contradictory and neither is dependent upon the other either. For example, if someone stumbled across some amazing discovery of some other way the universe came to exist that completely refuted the Big Bang Theory, that would NOT dismiss evolution.
 
  • #11
NoTime said:
I suggest you actually read the Big Bang theory.

I agree... and while you're at it, epkid08, perhaps you should look up abiogenesis as well.
 
  • #12
The main point of my topic is not about the theory of evolution or what it states, it's about how can living organisms exist if they had nothing to reproduce from or evolve from, given that "Nothing existed before the Big Bang."
 
  • #13
Then look up abiogenesis, as suggested by BoomBoom.

You do realize the Big Bang is about how the universe was created, right? It makes no sense to have it in the question at all.
 
  • #14
Try reading this for the formation of life from non-life:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/

Of course this assumes that we start off with a young Earth to begin with. If you want to know how we came to have an Earth and a solar system to begin with you might want to read the entire Big Bang timeline till the formation of the planet.s
 
  • #15
epkid08 said:
The main point of my topic is not about the theory of evolution or what it states
The framing of your questions indicates that you do not have a good grasp of the theories you're asking about, however.

it's about how can living organisms exist if they had nothing to reproduce from or evolve from, given that "Nothing existed before the Big Bang."

As others have pointed out, that is the theory of abiogenesis. Time-wise, Big Bang > Abiogenesis > Evolution

In the very simplest version (you can look up more details in textbooks so we don't have to write a whole textbook here): The early conditions of the universe after the Big Bang were not conducive to formation of life. Lots of temperature changes and chemical reactions happened first, and eventually those reactions led to an atmosphere with appropriate mixes of gases for supporting life, liquid water on the ground, chemical molecules and compounds sufficiently abundant and concentrated on the ground to form life, and those compounds could come together in chemical reactions that would be the first life forms. Keep in mind that living organisms are mainly big bags of chemical reactions happening in an aqueous environment (our cells have a lot of water in them).

At this time, there is no reason to believe this happened only once either, unlike the formation of the universe which is believed to have all occurred from a single event (the Big Bang). If all the precursors and environment were right, early organisms may have formed in many different places from those precursors.

Now, AFTER those first organisms formed, THEN the process of evolution can start. Cells reproducing, mutating, coalescing into colonies, specializations of functions occurring within the colonies, functional specializations becoming more organized into organ systems (plants and animals), and more complex organisms forming.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K