MHB Berk's question via email about approximating change

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prove It
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Email
AI Thread Summary
The speed of sound in an ideal fluid is expressed as c = √(γRT), where T is the temperature in Kelvin. A 10% increase in temperature leads to an approximate change in speed, calculated using calculus. The derivative of c with respect to T is found to be d(c)/d(T) = √(γR)/(2√T). With a 10% increase in T, the resulting change in c is approximately c/20, indicating a 5% increase in the speed of sound. This analysis confirms the relationship between temperature changes and sound speed in ideal fluids.
Prove It
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,434
Reaction score
20
The speed of sound $\displaystyle \begin{align*} c \end{align*}$ in an ideal fluid is related to the temperature $\displaystyle \begin{align*} T \end{align*}$ (measured in $\displaystyle \begin{align*} ^{\circ} K \end{align*}$) by

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} c = \sqrt{\gamma \, R \, T} \end{align*}$

where $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \gamma \end{align*}$ and $\displaystyle \begin{align*} R \end{align*}$ are constants.

Suppose that $\displaystyle \begin{align*} T \end{align*}$ increases by 10% from some base value. Use calculus to determine the approximate percentage change in $\displaystyle \begin{align*} c \end{align*}$, according to the ideal fluid model.

If we remember that the derivative is defined by $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} = \lim_{\Delta\,x \to 0} \frac{y\left( x + \Delta\,x \right) - y\left( x \right)}{\Delta \, x} \end{align*}$ then that means that as long as $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta \,x \end{align*}$ is small, then $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}y}{\mathrm{d}x} \approx \frac{\Delta \,y}{\Delta\,x} \end{align*}$.

Thus we can say $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}c}{\mathrm{d}T} \approx \frac{\Delta\,c}{\Delta\,T} \end{align*}$ and so $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta\,c \approx \frac{\mathrm{d}c}{\mathrm{d}T}\,\Delta\,T \end{align*}$.

Now from $\displaystyle \begin{align*} c = \sqrt{\gamma\,R\,T} \end{align*}$ we have $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\mathrm{d}c}{\mathrm{d}T} = \frac{\sqrt{\gamma\,R}}{2\,\sqrt{T}} \end{align*}$, and so with a 10\% increase in T, that means $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta\,T = \frac{T}{10} \end{align*}$, thus

$\displaystyle \begin{align*} \Delta\,c &\approx \frac{\sqrt{\gamma\,R}}{2\,\sqrt{T}}\cdot \frac{T}{10} \\ &= \frac{\sqrt{\gamma\,R\,T}}{20} \\ &= \frac{c}{20} \end{align*}$

So that means that the change in c is $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{1}{20} \end{align*}$ of the original c, so a 5% increase.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
11K
Back
Top