Best way to solve Schrodinger's wave equation numerically.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Slide rule
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Schrödinger wave equation numerically for animation in Maple, specifically in one dimension. The equation is represented as iħ ∂ψ/∂t = -(ħ²/2m) ∂²ψ/∂x² + V(x)ψ, where the Hamiltonian is defined as Hφ_i = E_iφ_i. The recommended approach involves discretizing space to form a matrix representation of the Hamiltonian, using finite difference methods for the momentum operator, and calculating initial coefficients of the wave function to animate the solution over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schrödinger wave equation
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of finite difference methods
  • Basic skills in Maple for plotting and animation
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to discretize the Hamiltonian into a matrix form
  • Learn about finite difference approximations for quantum mechanics
  • Explore the integration of wave functions using numerical methods
  • Investigate Maple's capabilities for animating mathematical functions
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, computational scientists, and students interested in numerical methods for quantum mechanics, particularly those looking to visualize solutions to the Schrödinger wave equation.

Slide rule
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been trying to research the best way to solve the Schrödinger wave equation numerically so that I can plot and animate it in Maple. I'd also like to animate as it is affected by a potential. I have been trying for weeks to do this and I don't feel any closer than when I started. I have looked at finite difference method but I get so far and don't know what to do next.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The sort of thing I'm looking for is like in this presentation on youtube, especially at 11s leading onto something like the animation at 13s.

http://m.youtube.com/watch?hl=en-GB&client=mv-google&gl=GB&v=Xj9PdeY64rA&fulldescription=1

Thanks you very much
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give more detail? What is the Hamiltonian? In how many dimensions?

And there is no link to the YouTube video.
 
Hi, sorry for not posting the link, I was very tired when making this post, definitely an oversight on my part. I will be able to post the link in just over an hour.

With regards to dimensions in would only be in 1 dimension along x. Regarding the hamiltonian I am trying to solve the equation as
i x hbar x diff(psi, t) = -(hbar^2)/2m x diff(psi, x$2) + V(x) x psi
where psi = psi(x, t).

Thank you for replying.
 
Since your potential is time independent, the fastest way to solve your problem is to first find the eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian
<br /> H \phi_i = E_i \phi_i<br />
To do this, discretize space and write the Hamiltonian as a matrix. As you said, you can use a finite difference approximation for the momentum operator.

Once you have the \phi_i, find the initial coefficients of your wave function in this basis,
<br /> \psi(x,t=0) = \sum_i c_i \phi_i(x)<br />
by calculating
<br /> c_i = \int \phi_i^*(x) \psi(x,t=0) dx<br />

Then, the wave function at any time time is simply given by
<br /> \psi(x,t) = \sum_i c_i \phi_i(x) \exp(-i E_i t / \hbar)<br />
By advancing t and refreshing the plot, you will get your animation. I have no idea how to do this in Maple :frown:
 
I have been trying to research the best way to solve the Schrödinger wave equation numerically so that I can plot and animate it in Maple. I'd also like to animate as it is affected by a potential. I have been trying for weeks to do this and I don't feel any closer than when I started. I have looked at finite difference method but I get so far and don't know what to do next.
Slide rule, Why not ask this question over on the Diff Eq forum.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K