I Between a Zeptometer and the Planck length

PEGELLA
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
What exists that is smaller then a zeptometer yet larger than the Planck Length?
What exists between approximately 1 X 10 E-21 meters (preon length?) and the Planck Length of 1.6 X 10 E-35 meters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. The Scale of the Universe 2 https://htwins.net/scale2/ shows top quark and neutrino there but it also says "the length shorter than this (femtometer) are not confirmed."
 
Probably not much.

Very high frequency ultraviolet photons can have arbitrarily small wavelengths up to Heisenberg uncertainty principle limits.

There is no good evidence that preons exist. Indeed, it would take a major reworking of of understanding of physics for them to work because of the experimental limits on binding energy for them (also here).

On the other hand, the point particle concept that is used in the Standard Model for fundamental particles may break down at sufficiently small distance scales beyond the reach of current experimental detection. Renormalization calculations for quantum field theory sometimes have cutoffs equivalent to distances on that order of magnitude.

This is the premise, for example, of string theory that posits that fundamental particles are excitations of tiny, but finite length superstrings, and isn't really too specific about how long those strings have to be because not a lot of observable consequences flow from that over a fairly wide range of many orders of magnitude.

Observational Lorenz invariance violation tests have excluded it to very fine distance scales, which tend to disfavor some kinds of theories in which space-time is itself discrete along the lines of loop quantum gravity, although there are workarounds for this issue.
 
Last edited:
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
203
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top