Between a Zeptometer and the Planck length

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the theoretical concepts existing between the preon length of approximately 1 X 10 E-21 meters and the Planck length of 1.6 X 10 E-35 meters. It highlights the lack of evidence for preons and the implications of the Standard Model's point particle concept potentially breaking down at extremely small scales. The conversation also touches on string theory, which suggests that fundamental particles are excitations of superstrings, and the challenges posed by observational Lorenz invariance violation tests to theories like loop quantum gravity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory and renormalization
  • Familiarity with the Standard Model of particle physics
  • Knowledge of string theory concepts
  • Awareness of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle on particle physics
  • Explore the fundamentals of string theory and its predictions
  • Investigate the current experimental limits on binding energy for preons
  • Study observational Lorenz invariance violation tests and their impact on theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced concepts of particle physics and the fundamental structure of the universe.

PEGELLA
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What exists that is smaller then a zeptometer yet larger than the Planck Length?
What exists between approximately 1 X 10 E-21 meters (preon length?) and the Planck Length of 1.6 X 10 E-35 meters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. The Scale of the Universe 2 https://htwins.net/scale2/ shows top quark and neutrino there but it also says "the length shorter than this (femtometer) are not confirmed."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
Probably not much.

Very high frequency ultraviolet photons can have arbitrarily small wavelengths up to Heisenberg uncertainty principle limits.

There is no good evidence that preons exist. Indeed, it would take a major reworking of of understanding of physics for them to work because of the experimental limits on binding energy for them (also here).

On the other hand, the point particle concept that is used in the Standard Model for fundamental particles may break down at sufficiently small distance scales beyond the reach of current experimental detection. Renormalization calculations for quantum field theory sometimes have cutoffs equivalent to distances on that order of magnitude.

This is the premise, for example, of string theory that posits that fundamental particles are excitations of tiny, but finite length superstrings, and isn't really too specific about how long those strings have to be because not a lot of observable consequences flow from that over a fairly wide range of many orders of magnitude.

Observational Lorenz invariance violation tests have excluded it to very fine distance scales, which tend to disfavor some kinds of theories in which space-time is itself discrete along the lines of loop quantum gravity, although there are workarounds for this issue.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
846
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K