Undergrad Between a Zeptometer and the Planck length

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the theoretical gap between the preon length of approximately 1 X 10 E-21 meters and the Planck length of 1.6 X 10 E-35 meters. There is currently no substantial evidence for the existence of preons, and their acceptance would require significant changes to existing physics due to constraints on binding energy. The Standard Model's point particle concept may fail at extremely small scales, suggesting the need for new theories like string theory, which proposes that fundamental particles are manifestations of finite-length superstrings. Additionally, tests for Lorenz invariance violations have ruled out certain theories that suggest a discrete structure of space-time, though some adaptations exist. Overall, the exploration of these scales remains speculative and largely unconfirmed.
PEGELLA
Messages
11
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
What exists that is smaller then a zeptometer yet larger than the Planck Length?
What exists between approximately 1 X 10 E-21 meters (preon length?) and the Planck Length of 1.6 X 10 E-35 meters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello. The Scale of the Universe 2 https://htwins.net/scale2/ shows top quark and neutrino there but it also says "the length shorter than this (femtometer) are not confirmed."
 
Probably not much.

Very high frequency ultraviolet photons can have arbitrarily small wavelengths up to Heisenberg uncertainty principle limits.

There is no good evidence that preons exist. Indeed, it would take a major reworking of of understanding of physics for them to work because of the experimental limits on binding energy for them (also here).

On the other hand, the point particle concept that is used in the Standard Model for fundamental particles may break down at sufficiently small distance scales beyond the reach of current experimental detection. Renormalization calculations for quantum field theory sometimes have cutoffs equivalent to distances on that order of magnitude.

This is the premise, for example, of string theory that posits that fundamental particles are excitations of tiny, but finite length superstrings, and isn't really too specific about how long those strings have to be because not a lot of observable consequences flow from that over a fairly wide range of many orders of magnitude.

Observational Lorenz invariance violation tests have excluded it to very fine distance scales, which tend to disfavor some kinds of theories in which space-time is itself discrete along the lines of loop quantum gravity, although there are workarounds for this issue.
 
Last edited:
"Supernovae evidence for foundational change to cosmological models" https://arxiv.org/pdf/2412.15143 The paper claims: We compare the standard homogeneous cosmological model, i.e., spatially flat ΛCDM, and the timescape cosmology which invokes backreaction of inhomogeneities. Timescape, while statistically homogeneous and isotropic, departs from average Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker evolution, and replaces dark energy by kinetic gravitational energy and its gradients, in explaining...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
712
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
14K