Bicycling on the Moon: Gravity's Effects on Bicycle Stability

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Loren Booda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the effects of the Moon's gravity on bicycle stability compared to Earth's gravity. Participants explore theoretical implications, practical considerations for lunar transportation, and the physics of balance and motion in different gravitational environments.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a bicycle may be easier to balance on the Moon due to the lower gravitational pull, allowing for slower falls and more reaction time.
  • Others argue that falling while riding a bicycle is primarily related to the center of gravity of the bicycle-rider combination, rather than the gravitational field itself.
  • A few participants suggest that bicycles could serve as effective transportation in a lunar colony, potentially reducing the cumbersome hopping motion experienced by astronauts.
  • Concerns are raised about the difficulty of achieving speed and maneuverability on a bicycle in low gravity, with some suggesting that the effort required to pedal may be different due to reduced weight.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of gravitational fields, with some participants asserting that even a minimal gravitational field affects how one would fall or balance on a bicycle.
  • Some participants mention the possibility of zero gravity points in space, though this is debated in terms of practical relevance to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of gravity in bicycle stability, with no consensus reached. Some believe gravity significantly impacts balance, while others maintain it is less relevant. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the overall implications of lunar gravity on bicycle use.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions, such as the need for a breathable environment and the similarity of conditions to Earth, which may affect their arguments. The discussion also highlights the complexity of gravitational effects on motion and balance.

  • #31
ernestpworrel said:
Don't get all mad, Dave. :)
You must have driven your parents crazy in your 'but why is the sky blue?' phase...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ernestpworrel said:
Don't get all mad, Dave. :)

Dave doesn't get mad; he gets logical. That's far more frightening. I can certainly understand his frustration in this instance. People are trying to counter his knowledge of physics with preconceived notions of how things work based upon terrestrial existence. That irritates me, as well.
 
  • #33
DaveC426913 said:
You must have driven your parents crazy in your 'but why is the sky blue?' phase...

So you understand where I'm coming from now, do you?
 
  • #34
ernestpworrel said:
So you understand where I'm coming from now, do you?
Uh well, since you ask, I think you've been obtuse, missing the point. Now you seem to be pretending that you were agreeing with me all along.
 
  • #35
DaveC426913 said:
Now you seem to be pretending that you were agreeing with me all along.

I'd be interested to know why you think this. PM me about it. I think the OP has been answered.
 
  • #36
It seems kind of obvious from an external perspective. You were arguing against Dave until you realized that you were losing, then turned around and claimed that you were agreeing with him. It might be a clever approach to winning arguments where you come from, but it's way too transparent to fly here.
 
  • #37
One thing that hasn't been mentioned is tyre grip on the Moon.

It works out that at 1/6 of Eath's gravity (which is what you have on the Moon) the rubber tyre grip goes down to 1/4 of what it would be here on Earth. (not 1/6, because the coefficient of friction goes up by a factor of about 1.43 for a 1/6 load)

So if a bike on Earth can corner at 1G (9.81m/s/s), on the moon the same bike has max cornering grip of only 1/4G.

So in that sense it would be harder to stay on it. - You'd have to corner a lot slower to keep the bike from falling away from underneath you anyway.

Oh, and braking. You wouldn't be able to stop as quickly for the same reason. Or accelerate - bikes accelerate pretty fast from a standstill here on Earth, so just getting going could be quite difficult - though I admit I've never tried this myself..
 
  • #38
But we'd be using Moon rubber; surely that's different... :rolleyes:
 
  • #39
YellowTaxi said:
One thing that hasn't been mentioned is tyre grip on the Moon.

It works out that at 1/6 of Eath's gravity (which is what you have on the Moon) the rubber tyre grip goes down to 1/4 of what it would be here on Earth. (not 1/6, because the coefficient of friction goes up by a factor of about 1.43 for a 1/6 load..
The coefficient of friction (COF) is a unitless ratio of the horizontal force to push (or pull) an object divided by its (vertical) weight (gravitational force mg) on the moon. Why does the COF change on the Moon?
Bob S
 
  • #40
The coef of friction for rubber goes up if the force pushing it down is lower.

i.e. It just happens that for rubber the coef of friction isn't at all constant, and rubber grips a little better with less weight on it. That's why race cars are usually built as light as regulations allow, to give them max grip.

Moving to the Moon makes things a bit weirder, because you're not reducing the mass of the vehicle, only it's weight is reduced. It's the weight (or normal reaction to the weight if you prefer) that gives the tyre it's grip. The mass is that which tries to keep the vehicle moving in a straight line. That has stayed the same as on Earth, but your friction is less.

I think I explained that a bit backwards, I probably should have put the 3rd paragraph first to explain why grip is lower on the moon in the first place. The fact the coef of friction changes a bit adds some extra info but isn't that important is it. As far as I know the info I've given is correct.
 
  • #41
ernestpworrel said:
I'd be interested to know why you think this. PM me about it.
I don't really see how any good can come from that.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad I never fully understood gyroscopic precession - toppling gyroscopes
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
High School Time to fall from 200 miles
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Undergrad Question about Moon's gravitational effect on tidal bulge
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Graduate Testing Newtonian Gravity: Collision of Two Masses
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Undergrad Angular momentum and turning a bicycle
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
High School Balancing a bicycle that is moving fast, rather than one that is moving slow
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Physics EE (Extended Essay) on Bicycle Stability
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Graduate How Does the Sun's Tidal Effect Influence Earth's Rotation and Moon's Orbit?
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Undergrad How much does the mass of the earth effect moon gravity?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Undergrad An apple falls from a tree, Does the moon move as a result?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K