Bijective Homomorphisms and Isomorphisms

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WWGD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homomorphisms
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A bijective homomorphism h from algebraic structure A to B is indeed an isomorphism under specific definitions of algebra. In universal algebra, isomorphisms are defined as bijective structure-preserving maps, and all such maps are isomorphisms in categorical settings. Additionally, in algebraic categories, bimorphisms are also isomorphisms. The discussion highlights the relationship between algebraic structures and compact Hausdorff spaces, where bijective continuous functions are homeomorphisms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of bijective homomorphisms and isomorphisms
  • Familiarity with universal algebra concepts
  • Knowledge of algebraic categories and their properties
  • Basic principles of topology, particularly compact Hausdorff spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the definitions and properties of universal algebra
  • Explore the concept of algebraic categories and bimorphisms
  • Research the relationship between topology and algebraic structures
  • Read about continuous functions on compact Hausdorff spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebraists, and topologists interested in the interplay between algebraic structures and topology, particularly those studying homomorphisms and isomorphisms in various mathematical contexts.

WWGD
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
7,777
Reaction score
13,013
Hi All,

Let A,B be algebraic structures and let h A-->B be a bijective homomorphism.
Is h an isomorphism? In topology, we have continuous bijections that are not homeomorphisms,
(similar in Functional Analysis )so I wondered if the "same" was possible in Algebra. I assume if there is a counterexample, it requires an infinite set in the construction, or some result in order theory, or some issue with torsion .

Thanks,

WWGD: "What Would Gauss Do?".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Depends on what you mean with "algebra".

There are two ways I could generalize algebra. The first way is through universal algebra. That generalizes a lot of algebraic objects such as modules, groups, rings, etc. A free course can be found here: http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/~snburris/htdocs/ualg.html A isomorphism there is defined as a bijective structure-preserving map. One can indeed prove that for all universal algebras, all such isomorphisms are isomorphisms in the categorical setting.

Another definition of algebra would consist of the notion of algebraic category. For example, see the "joy of cats": http://katmat.math.uni-bremen.de/acc/acc.pdf chapter VI
In particular, see proposition 23.7. That implies that all bimorphisms (= both mono and epimorphisms) are isomorphisms. In particular, for all usual algebraic categories (usual = concrete category over set), the surjective and injective morphisms will indeed be isomorphisms.

It is interesting to note that the category of all compact Hausdorff spaces is also considered algebraic. That the bijective continuous functions between compact Hausdorff spaces are homeomorphisms is well known. But the algebraicity of the compact Hausdorff spaces predicts somehow that the compact Hausdorff spaces should be determined by some "conventional" algebraic structure. This algebraic structure is the ring of continuous functions: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continuous_functions_on_a_compact_Hausdorff_space
This excellent book gives more information: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1258632012/?tag=pfamazon01-20
 
Last edited by a moderator:
O.K, thanks, micromass.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
994
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
642
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K