Unraveling the Mystery of Binaural Beats: Nat's Story

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the phenomenon of binaural beats, specifically the auditory processing involved when different frequencies are presented to each ear. The example provided illustrates how a 100 Hz sine wave in the left ear and a 106 Hz sine wave in the right ear create a perceived beating effect in the brain. The conversation highlights the role of hair cells in the cochlea and the limitations of neuronal firing rates, particularly the cut-off frequency beyond which neurons cannot respond in a 1:1 manner. Recent research indicates that the auditory periphery contributes significantly to novelty detection in the brain, suggesting that the perceived interference of binaural beats is a legitimate auditory experience rather than an illusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binaural beats and auditory processing
  • Knowledge of cochlear hair cell function and neuronal firing rates
  • Familiarity with Fourier analysis in sound representation
  • Awareness of auditory neuroscience and sub-cortical processing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of binaural beats and their psychological effects
  • Explore the role of cochlear hair cells in sound perception
  • Study the implications of the cut-off frequency in auditory neuroscience
  • Investigate recent findings on novelty detection in the auditory system
USEFUL FOR

Individuals interested in auditory neuroscience, sound therapy practitioners, psychologists studying auditory perception, and anyone exploring the effects of binaural beats on mental states.

NatanijelVasic
Messages
19
Reaction score
5
Hello everyone,

I have been thinking about binaural beats, and after learning about the inner workings of the ear, there is something that I cannot explain. A binaural beat is the pulsating effect perceived by the brain when slightly offset frequencies are played in each ear.

In my example, the left ear receives a sine wave of 100 Hz, and the right ear receives a sine of 106 Hz. The person is wearing headphones, so the audio waves do not mix in the air, and therefore there is no interference in the air.
( ) ,
Inside each ear, the mechanical vibrations cause a certain region of hair cells to vibrate and each region corresponds to a certain resonant frequency. This means that the information sent by neurones from the ear to the brain is a Fourier representation of the original sound (neurones cannot handle fast switching, which is why audio frequencies cannot be transported in the original form through the nerve).
From the example above, this means that the brain is receiving a CONSTANT signal input from the left ear, and a constant signal input from the right - the only difference being that the left and right neurones correspond to different frequency ranges.
The mystery is this: where does the signal interference occur in order to cause the beating effect? An inverse Fourier cannot occur in the brain as the neurones "don't support" frequencies as high as audio. The brain might well add the Fourier representation of the signals from each ear, but that won't explain where the interference comes from. What is even more interesting, is that the beating effect from the interference is exactly the correct frequency i.e. the same frequency as would occur in the medium of sound. This suggests that the perceived interference is not than just an illusion, but "mathematical" signal progressing within the brain.

I would be extremely grateful for any responses :)

Nat

An example of binaural beats:

(try taking out the Left earbud only, then the right only, then listen to both at the same time)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189
Biology news on Phys.org
At least some of the neurons innervating the ear sensory cells in the cochlea receive input only from hair cells responsive to a single frequency.
In addition, at lower frequencies, some of these neurons can fire 1:1 with the vibrations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NatanijelVasic
BillTre said:
At least some of the neurons innervating the ear sensory cells in the cochlea receive input only from hair cells responsive to a single frequency.
In addition, at lower frequencies, some of these neurons can fire 1:1 with the vibrations.

Thank you very much for your response. Does that mean neurones in the ear can fire at 1000Hz and perhaps even slightly above?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Merlin3189
There is a cut-off where the neurons can't keep up with faster rates. I forget what that cut-off frequency is. Above that, the response is not 1:1.
It would be either an increase in a base rate of neuron firing or it might fire only when the hair cells fire (another thing I forgot).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NatanijelVasic
No one is arguing with you. This 'mathematical' signaling process likely occurs.

More recent work on the topic: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264887690_Mismatch_negativity_to_acoustical_illusion_of_beat_How_and_where_the_change_detection_takes_place https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264887690_Mismatch_negativity_to_acoustical_illusion_of_beat_How_and_where_the_change_detection_takes_place
"These findings suggest that the auditory periphery has an important contribution to
novelty detection process already at sub-cortical level. Overall, a signif-
icant outcome of this study is that the detection of acoustic novelty in
the human brain is represented via a multiple-level hierarchy extending
beyond the auditory cortex. "
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NatanijelVasic, Buzz Bloom and BillTre
Fervent Freyja said:
No one is arguing with you. This 'mathematical' signaling process likely occurs.

More recent work on the topic: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264887690_Mismatch_negativity_to_acoustical_illusion_of_beat_How_and_where_the_change_detection_takes_place https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264887690_Mismatch_negativity_to_acoustical_illusion_of_beat_How_and_where_the_change_detection_takes_place
"These findings suggest that the auditory periphery has an important contribution to
novelty detection process already at sub-cortical level. Overall, a signif-
icant outcome of this study is that the detection of acoustic novelty in
the human brain is represented via a multiple-level hierarchy extending
beyond the auditory cortex. "

Ah I think that would explain it then. I did a test myself and the beating effect does seem to disappear at higher frequencies (i tried at around 5 KHz).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Fervent Freyja

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
12K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K