Binomial Coefficient Factorial Derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the binomial coefficient formula, specifically C(n,k) = n! / (k!(n-k)!). The participants clarify that this formula represents both the number of combinations of k items from n and the corresponding entry in Pascal's triangle. The reasoning involves understanding arrangements of colored objects, where the total arrangements are divided by the arrangements of indistinguishable items to yield the binomial coefficient. This foundational concept is essential for combinatorial mathematics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of factorial notation and operations
  • Familiarity with combinatorial concepts, specifically combinations
  • Knowledge of Pascal's triangle and its properties
  • Basic mathematical induction principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Pascal's triangle in depth
  • Explore advanced combinatorial identities and their proofs
  • Learn about the applications of binomial coefficients in probability theory
  • Investigate the relationship between binomial coefficients and polynomial expansions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in combinatorics, and anyone interested in understanding the foundations of binomial coefficients and their applications in various fields of mathematics.

Odious Suspect
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
A few decades ago my algebra teacher showed how to construct the expression for binomial coefficients. If I start with Pascal's recursion, and propose C(n,k)=n!/k!(n-k)!, I can prove it to be so through induction. But that doesn't give me that happy feeling that comes with understanding.

It can't be that hard; so I'm feeling really dumb at this point. How does one build up the relationship C(n,k)=n!/k!(n-k)! from scratch?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is your ##C(n,k)## the number in Pascal's triangle at position ##(n,k)## or the number of combinations of ##k## balls out of ##n##?
I know it's the same. I ask for definition.
 
If you have ##n## things and ##k## of them are one colour (white, say) and the remaining ##n-k## of them are another colour (black), then there are ##\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}## ways to arrange them.

To see this, imagine they are numbered ##1 - n##. The total number of ways of arranging them is ##n!##. But, how many are the same black/white pattern - ignoring the numbers and looking just at the colour?

First, the ##k## white things can be put in any order - that's ##k!## - without changing the white/black pattern. And, the ##n-k## black things can likewise be re-arranged in any order without changing the pattern.

The total number of white/black patterns is, therefore, ##\frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}##

Now, think of the ##n## objects (all black, say), numbered and in order. We want to pick any ##k##. This is what ##\binom{n}{k}## means: how many ways to choose ##k## objects from ##n##.

If we do this by marking the ones we choose as white, then we see that every choice corresponds to a black/white pattern and vice versa. And, therefore, we have:

##\binom{n}{k} = \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}##
 
I'm still not sure whether I understood you. Say you have n numbered balls which k of them are black and white the rest. There are n! ways to order them. If you now decide to just look at the colors you have to divide by the k! orderings of black balls and (n-k)! orderings of white balls.
There are plenty of stories about this triangle. Some are here: http://www.mathsisfun.com/pascals-triangle.html
Ok, the page looks a bit childish. Nevertheless it might give you a kind of intuition.
 
iB=\left\{b_1,b_2,\ldots ,b_n\right\},\text{Null}b_i=T|F

B_j=\left\{b_{j_1},b_{j_2},\ldots ,b_{j_n}\right\} is the ##j^{\text{th}}## permutation of ##B##, so ##B_0=B##.

##A\left(B_j\right)## is an arrangement of ##B## such that A\left(B_j\right)=A\left(B_k\right) means \left\{b_{j_1},b_{j_2},\ldots ,b_{j_n}\right\}=\left\{b_{k_1},b_{k_2},\ldots ,b_{k_n}\right\}. That is to say, T=b_{j_i}=b_{k_i} or F=b_{j_i}=b_{k_i}

B=C[B,k]\Rightarrow b_1=b_2=,\ldots ,=b_k=T\land b_{k+1}=b_{k+2}=,\ldots ,=b_n=F

P(B,j)=B_j is the transformation from B to B_j

Let A_q=A(P(B,q))=A\left(B_q\right) where q is the smallest permutation index for permutations with the same arrangement.

The number of arrangements A_q for a given C[B,k] is \left(\begin{array}{c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} \right).

If A(B)=A\left(B_m\right) then A(P(B,j))=A\left(P\left(B_m,j\right)\right)

To find the number of arrangements we divide the total number of permutation by the number of permutations satisfying A\left(B_j\right)=A_0

The total number of permutations of B is n!. The number of permutations satisfying A(C[B,k]) is the number of permutations of \left\{b_1,b_2,\ldots ,b_k\right\} times the number of permutations of \left\{b_{k+1},b_{k+2},\ldots ,b_n\right\}. That is k! (n-k)!.

Unfortunately, the library is closing, so this is fire and forget. I don't have time to proof it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have to admit, I cheated. This gave me the nudge that got me started.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K