Binomial expansion, general coefficient

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the coefficient of x^n in the series expansion of the function 1/((1+2x)(3-x)). Participants explore the binomial expansion and series representation of the function, attempting to derive a general formula for the coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to expand the function using binomial series and question the patterns in the coefficients. They explore different representations of the series and discuss the implications of their findings on the coefficient of x^n.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and suggestions for approaching the problem. Some have proposed methods to visualize the coefficients and have expressed uncertainty about their results, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note constraints related to the convergence of the series and the conditions under which the expansions are valid. There is also mention of the complexity introduced by the multiplication of series and the challenge of expressing coefficients in simpler forms.

Appleton
Messages
91
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the coefficient of x^n in the expansion of each of the following functions as a series of ascending powers of x.

\frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(1+2x)^{-1} = 1 + (-1)2x + \frac{(-1)(-2)}{2!}(2x)^2 + \frac{(-1)(-2)(-3)}{3!}(2x)^3... -1<2x<1

= 1 - 2x + 4x^2 - 8x^3... -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}

\frac{1}{3}(1-\frac{x}{3})^{-1} = \frac{1}{3}(1 + (-1)(-\frac{x}{3}) + \frac{(-1)(-2)}{2!}(-\frac{x}{3})^2 + \frac{(-1)(-2)(-3)}{3!}(-\frac{x}{3})^3...) -1<-\frac{x}{3}<1

= \frac{1}{3} + \frac{x}{9} + \frac{x^2}{27} + \frac{x^3}{81}... -3<x<3

\frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)}=\frac{1}{3}-\frac{5}{9}x+\frac{31}{27}x^2-\frac{185}{81}x^3... -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}

I can't see an obvious pattern in the numerators of the coefficients, perhaps I should be able to. So I look at the coefficient of each binomial where I see that the coefficient of x^n in the expansion of (1+2x)^{-1} is (-2)^n and the coefficient of x^n in the expansion of (3-x)^{-1} is (\frac{1}{3})^{n+1}. So \frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)} could also be expressed as (\sum^{∞}_{r=0}(-2x)^r)(\sum^{∞}_{r=0}(\frac{1}{3})^{r+1}(x)^r) -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}. However as I feel I am getting tantalisingly close to a solution I realize that their multiplication complicates matters.

So I start to look at patterns in the process of multiplying the 2 expansions together and find that
\frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)}=\frac{1}{3}(\sum^{∞}_{r=0} (-1)^r(2x)^r(\sum^{∞}_{k=0} (\frac{x}{3})^k)) -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}

By now I've strayed into territory outside of my textbook, ie the recursive summation, this might well be meaningless as it looks like it never bottoms out of the k loop, but I hope it illustrates my thought process, however Ill conceived it might be.
I thought there might be a way to eliminate the k in the last expression to yield my general coefficient.
Any guidance on the approach to tackling this kind of problem would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Appleton said:

Homework Statement


Find the coefficient of x^n in the expansion of each of the following functions as a series of ascending powers of x.

\frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)}


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(1+2x)^{-1} = 1 + (-1)2x + \frac{(-1)(-2)}{2!}(2x)^2 + \frac{(-1)(-2)(-3)}{3!}(2x)^3... -1<2x<1

= 1 - 2x + 4x^2 - 8x^3... -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}

\frac{1}{3}(1-\frac{x}{3})^{-1} = \frac{1}{3}(1 + (-1)(-\frac{x}{3}) + \frac{(-1)(-2)}{2!}(-\frac{x}{3})^2 + \frac{(-1)(-2)(-3)}{3!}(-\frac{x}{3})^3...) -1<-\frac{x}{3}<1

= \frac{1}{3} + \frac{x}{9} + \frac{x^2}{27} + \frac{x^3}{81}... -3<x<3

\frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)}=\frac{1}{3}-\frac{5}{9}x+\frac{31}{27}x^2-\frac{185}{81}x^3... -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}

I can't see an obvious pattern in the numerators of the coefficients, perhaps I should be able to. So I look at the coefficient of each binomial where I see that the coefficient of x^n in the expansion of (1+2x)^{-1} is (-2)^n and the coefficient of x^n in the expansion of (3-x)^{-1} is (\frac{1}{3})^{n+1}. So \frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)} could also be expressed as (\sum^{∞}_{r=0}(-2x)^r)(\sum^{∞}_{r=0}(\frac{1}{3})^{r+1}(x)^r) -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}. However as I feel I am getting tantalisingly close to a solution I realize that their multiplication complicates matters.

So I start to look at patterns in the process of multiplying the 2 expansions together and find that
\frac{1}{(1+2x)(3-x)}=\frac{1}{3}(\sum^{∞}_{r=0} (-1)^r(2x)^r(\sum^{∞}_{k=0} (\frac{x}{3})^k)) -\frac{1}{2}<x<\frac{1}{2}

You can swap multiplication by (-2x)^r and summation over k to obtain
<br /> \frac{1}{(1 + 2x)(3 - x)} = \frac13 \sum_{r=0}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^r2^r}{3^k}x^{r+k}<br />
and now the change of variables to n = r + k and m = k where 0 \leq n \leq \infty and 0 \leq m \leq n suggests itself.
 
Thanks for your reply pasmith. Trying to follow your suggestion I got the coefficient of x^n as \sum ^{∞}_{m} \frac{(-2)^{n-m}}{3^{m+1}} which I struggled to make sense of.
But by using your distribution of (-2x)^r I was able to visualise the whole summation as a 2 dimensional array of terms and by adding diagonal terms come up with an expression for the coefficient of every nth power of x:
\sum ^{n}_{m=0} \frac{(-2)^m3^{m-1}<br /> }{3^n}
However I am still unable to express this coefficient in terms of just n and without the summation. Something tells me I'm making more of a meal of this than is necessary.
 
Appleton said:
Thanks for your reply pasmith. Trying to follow your suggestion I got the coefficient of x^n as \sum ^{∞}_{m} \frac{(-2)^{n-m}}{3^{m+1}} which I struggled to make sense of. But by using your distribution of (-2x)^r I was able to visualise the whole summation as a 2 dimensional array of terms and by adding diagonal terms

This is indeed the idea.


come up with an expression for the coefficient of every nth power of x:
\sum ^{n}_{m=0} \frac{(-2)^m3^{m-1}<br /> }{3^n}
However I am still unable to express this coefficient in terms of just n and without the summation. Something tells me I'm making more of a meal of this than is necessary.

Your sum here is a geometric series: <br /> \sum ^{n}_{m=0} \frac{(-2)^m3^{m-1}}{3^n} = \frac1{3^{n+1}} \sum_{m=0}^n (-6)^m. There is a formula for summing such series.

The stricter constraint is that |x| &lt; \frac12, so it makes sense to express the series in powers of 2x rather than x/3. Hence <br /> \frac13 \sum_{r=0}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^\infty (-2x)^r \frac{x^k}{3^k}<br /> = \frac13 \sum_{r=0}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{1}{3^k(-2)^k} (-2x)^{r+k}<br /> = \frac13 \sum_{r=0}^\infty \sum_{k=0}^\infty \left(-\frac{1}{6}\right)^k (-2x)^{r+k}<br /> = \frac13 \sum_{n=0}^\infty (-2x)^n \sum_{k=0}^n \left(-\frac{1}{6}\right)^k<br /> where the sum over k is again a geometric series.

One can show that both expressions for the coefficient of x^n are equal, as they must be.
 
So the coefficient is \frac{1}{21}(3^{-1}+(-1)^n(2)^{n+1}(3)).
I still don't follow the substitution of n for r+k. How is that justified?
 
Appleton said:
So the coefficient is \frac{1}{21}(3^{-1}+(-1)^n(2)^{n+1}(3)).
I still don't follow the substitution of n for r+k. How is that justified?

The series is absolutely convergent, so its terms can be re-ordered. Instead of taking them in the order (0,0), (0,1), (0,2), ..., (1,0), (1,1), ... one takes them in the order (0,0), (1,0), (0,1), (2,0), (1,1), (0,2), ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Appleton said:
So the coefficient is \frac{1}{21}(3^{-1}+(-1)^n(2)^{n+1}(3)).
I still don't follow the substitution of n for r+k. How is that justified?

Originally you have a sum over all pairs (r,k) with 0 ≤ r < ∞ and 0 ≤ k < ∞. This is just all the points in the lattice {(0,0), (1,0), (0,1), (1,1), (0,2) ,... } in 2-dimensional (r,k)-space. Because of absolute convergence (at least, in a certain x-range) you can re-express the sum: sum over each of the ##45^o ## lines ##r+k = 0, 1, 2, \ldots##, and within each such line, sum over the lattice points contained in that portion of the line between the k and r axes. That is, for fixed ##r+k = n## you need to do the sum for (say) ##k = 0,1,2, \ldots, n##, with ##r = n - k## for each such ##k##. Why would you do that? The answer is: because you have terms ##x^{r+k}## in the sum, and you want to isolate the coefficient of ##x^{r+k}## for each fixed value ##r+k = n##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thank you both very much for your help, very interesting and illuminating.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K