Swamp Thing
- 1,028
- 763
History of the scanning electron microscope
Columbia is a university, Colombia is a country in South AmericaFrabjous said:Schwinger’s time at Colombia
https://www.physics.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/Schwinger Article.pdf
Chapter 2 of Climbing the Mountain by Mehra and Milton
Source?Hornbein said:I have read that re-analysis of Eddington's eclipse data that allegedly confirmed general relativity were inconclusive.
It has been claimed that Eddington's observations were of poor quality, and he had unjustly discounted simultaneous observations at Sobral, Brazil, which appeared closer to the Newtonian model, but a 1979 re-analysis with modern measuring equipment and contemporary software validated Eddington's results and conclusions.[12] The quality of the 1919 results was indeed poor compared to later observations, but was sufficient to persuade contemporary astronomers. The rejection of the results from the expedition to Brazil was due to a defect in the telescopes used which, again, was completely accepted and well understood by contemporary astronomers.[13]
12. Kennefick, Daniel (5 September 2007). "Not Only Because of Theory: Dyson, Eddington and the Competing Myths of the 1919 Eclipse Expedition". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. arXiv:0709.0685. Bibcode:2007arXiv0709.0685K. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.07.010. S2CID 119203172.
13. Kennefick, Daniel (1 March 2009). "Testing relativity from the 1919 eclipse – a question of bias". Physics Today. 62 (3): 37–42. Bibcode:2009PhT....62c..37K. doi:10.1063/1.3099578.
gmax137 said:Source?
It has been claimed that Eddington's observations were of poor quality,
Yes, I'd say you're off the mark. Teleparallel gravity is a theory of spacetime torsion, and it is both well-founded and regularly studied. For example, take a look at: The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity and the references therein.sbrothy said:I’m really sceptic about this “teleparallel gravity”. Am I way off the mark if it kinda reminds me of homeopathy?
renormalize said:Yes, I'd say you're off the mark. Teleparallel gravity is a theory of spacetime torsion, and it is both well-founded and regularly studied. For example, take a look at: The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity and the references therein.
renormalize said:Yes, I'd say you're off the mark. Teleparallel gravity is a theory of spacetime torsion, and it is both well-founded and regularly studied. For example, take a look at: The Geometrical Trinity of Gravity and the references therein.
You’re right. It’s almost pure speculation but I actually think Smolin’s idea there was falsifiable and, indeed, was falsified. Don’t hang me up on it, it’s in the papers there somewhere I think. But yes, it has zero practical applicability but any explanation, or indeed even hint, at why the cosmos is what it is is welcome with me.Hornbein said:My wet blanket view is that with the alleged multiverse we have no data whatsoever to go on so theories may florish unimpeded. Perhaps when said data somehow arrives then all or almost all of those theories will be thrown out.
It's like the attempts to translate ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics. When the Rosetta stone was dug up and translated all the prior attempts were found to be off base.
So I can't get all that excited about this kind of thing. If other people find it fun, go for it. Maybe I'll throw in my speculations some day.
Lars Brink Colleague, Friend and Collaboratorsbrothy said:Maybe these "biographies" would fit into a thread of their own.
(Arxiv): Lars Brink: November 12, 1943 - October 29, 2022
Fritz Haber: The Damned ScientistBWV said:Fritz Haber is a fascinating and tragic figure. On one hand, his eponymous process saved 2.7 billion human lives by some estimates. However he also led the German chemical weapons program in World War One and developed Zyklon B, which the Nazis used some 25 years later to murder his surviving family members
There seems to be more to arXiv than I initially, and naively I might add, thought. Thanks!Frabjous said:Condon “Tunneling - How It Started” A personal account of the early history of tunneling and the contribution of Ronald W. Gurney.
Am. J. Phys. 46, 319–323 (1978)
Also here
https://archive.org/details/selectedpopularw0000cond/page/332/mode/2up
A sad story.
Music has been called the temporal art par excellence. Yet, as this paper explains, it is also the atemporal art par excellence. The contradiction is, however, only apparent, and a result of viewing music from two possible perspectives. That it has these two perspectives is the focus of this paper. In particular, the way in which these two aspects of music allow it to function as a kind of conduit between transcendent and immanent; immaterial and material. This can help explain the power of music to touch places deep in the soul (the part of us that transcends matter and time), that other forms of art struggle to reach. A somewhat similar debate occurs in looking at mathematics from an ontological point of view. In particular the treatment of the real numbers. There are curious properties of real numbers that seem to put them, like music, in the realm of the transcendent: in terms of the amount of information to specify them, one requires infinite computer time since there is no repeating pattern to their decimal expansions. One must simply evolve the sequence, working through it, despite the fact that it might have a perfectly situated home in Platonia. In other words, bringing them into this world demands a temporal element. We explore these and other links to a variety of issues in physics, ultimately arguing for dual-aspect monism."
Belief perseverance is the widely documented tendency of holding to a belief, even in the presence of contradicting evidence. In online environments, this tendency leads to heated arguments with users ``blocking'' each other. Introducing this element to opinion modelling in a social network, leads to an adaptive network where agents tend to connect preferentially to like-minded peers. In this work we study how this type of dynamics behaves in the voter model with the addition of a noise that makes agents change opinion at random. As the intensity of the noise and the propensity of users blocking each other is changed, we observe a transition between 2 phases. One in which there is only one community in the whole network and another where communities arise and in each of then there is a very clear majority opinion, mimicking the phenomenon of echo chambers. These results are obtained with simulations and with a mean-field theory.
Signal Processing (SP) and Machine Learning (ML) rely on good math and coding knowledge, in particular, linear algebra, probability, and complex numbers. A good grasp of these relies on scalar algebra learned in middle school. The ability to understand and use scalar algebra well, in turn, relies on a good foundation in basic arithmetic. Because of various systemic barriers, many students are not able to build a strong foundation in arithmetic in elementary school. This leads them to struggle with algebra and everything after that. Since math learning is cumulative, the gap between those without a strong early foundation and everyone else keeps increasing over the school years and becomes difficult to fill in college. In this article we discuss how SP faculty and graduate students can play an important role in starting, and participating in, university-run (or other) out-of-school math support programs to supplement students' learning. Two example programs run by the authors (CyMath at ISU and Ab7G at Purdue) are briefly described. The second goal of this article is to use our perspective as SP, and engineering, educators who have seen the long-term impact of elementary school math teaching policies, to provide some simple almost zero cost suggestions that elementary schools could adopt to improve math learning: (i) more math practice in school, (ii) send small amounts of homework (individual work is critical in math), and (iii) parent awareness (math resources, need for early math foundation, clear in-school test information and sharing of feedback from the tests). In summary, good early math support (in school and through out-of-school programs) can help make SP and ML more accessible.
This short essay aims to offer a discursive presentation of three scientific articles by Ettore Majorana highlighting the fundamental importance of one of them - the last one - for the investigation of the intimate constitution of matter. The search for evidence to support Majorana's thesis is the prime motivation of the conference "Multi-Aspect Young Oriented Advanced Neutrino Academy" at the G.P. Grimaldi Foundation in Modica, Sicily.
[...] It is sometimes assumed that he [Gian Domenico Romagnosi] found a relationship between electricity and magnetism, about two decades before Hans Christian Ørsted's 1820 discovery of electromagnetism. However, his experiments did not deal with electric currents, and only showed that an electrostatic charge from a voltaic pile could deflect a magnetic needle. However, as Joseph Hamel has pointed out, Romagnosi's discovery was documented in the book by Joseph Izarn, Manuel du Galvanisme (1805), where a galvanic current (courant galvanique) is explicitly mentioned]. [...]
I argue that scientific determinism is not supported by facts, but results from the elegance of the mathematical language physicists use, in particular from the so-called real numbers and their infinite series of digits. Classical physics can thus be interpreted in a deterministic or indeterministic way. However, using quantum physics, some experiments prove that nature is able to continually produce new information, hence support indeterminism in physics.
pines-demon said:This semi-auto-biographical text is a great read:
- Whatever Happened to Solid-State Physics? - J.J. Hopfield, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys., 2014
This site can’t be reached
Check if there is a typo in whatever%20happened%20to%20solid-state%20physics
DNS_PROBE_FINISHED_NXDOMAIN
- If spelling is correct, try running Windows Network Diagnostics.