Is Bitcoin Mining Contributing to Climate Change?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Bitcoin mining significantly contributes to climate change due to its high energy consumption, often sourced from coal-fired power plants. The competition for cheap electricity raises costs and reduces profit margins for miners, particularly as Bitcoin rewards halve approximately every four years, decreasing profitability. Current estimates indicate that Bitcoin transactions consume as much energy as some small countries, such as Poland, highlighting the unsustainable nature of this technology. The latest IPCC report emphasizes the urgent need to reduce fossil fuel use by 45% by 2030, a target that appears increasingly unachievable given the current trajectory of Bitcoin mining.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bitcoin mining processes and economics
  • Knowledge of energy consumption metrics in cryptocurrency
  • Familiarity with the IPCC climate reports and their implications
  • Awareness of the impact of fossil fuel dependency on global warming
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the energy consumption of Bitcoin mining compared to traditional financial transactions
  • Explore advancements in energy-efficient mining hardware
  • Investigate alternative cryptocurrencies with lower environmental impacts
  • Study the implications of the Bitcoin reward halving on mining profitability and energy use
USEFUL FOR

Environmental scientists, cryptocurrency investors, policymakers, and anyone concerned with the ecological impact of blockchain technologies.

Computer science news on Phys.org
The bitcoin mining usually takes place in areas of cheap electricity rates because they use so much power. Mining competes with other users of electricity This competition for power will raise the price of electricity and the cost of mining.reducing profit margins. New plants will be required. At least in the near term there seems to be factors that will decrease the rate of expansion of this technology unless more efficient computing hardware are invented.
 
I think the article is a silly extrapolation that tells us something different from what the article is about: it tells us the widespread adoption of Bitcoin at the rates the authors modeled isn't feasible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
Yes the study has problems for one it is hard to know for sure how much energy is being used since mining is widely distributed and often secretive. But there are factors for both increased and decreased bitcoin expansion. One factor that regulates the amount of energy that bitcoin mining will use is that about every four years the bitcoin reward is cut in half making it less profitable to mine the next cut being 2020. So by 2030 at current bitcoin value the reward for mining is 1/8 of what it is today making the profit margin smaller. So unless the bitcoin value increase significantly mining will slow. As time goes on it takes longer to mine a bitcoin driving up the energy per transaction. Currently it is about 770 kwhrs/transactioin compared to about 1.70 whr/ transactions for one Visa transaction. Already it is estimated that bitcoin transactions use as much power as some small countries like Poland. Bitcoin miners will go to wherever the electricity is cheapest which often is where the power plants are coal fired exacerbating the problem.

Clearly this is not what the world needs at this time. The latest IPCC report say that we must reduce the fossil fuel use by 45% by 2030 to keep global warming under control. That means reducing fossil fuel use by about 4.5% per year starting immediately and hat ain't gong to happen.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K