Black body radiation -- Spherical shell surrounding a star

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of black body radiation in the context of a spherical shell surrounding a star. Participants are examining the implications of the formula for radiated energy and questioning how the radius of the shell affects the energy output.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of the official solution, particularly how energy output relates to the radius of the shell. Some are exploring the implications of enclosing a radiating body with a shell and discussing the concept of equilibrium temperature between the star and the shell.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and raising questions about the assumptions in the problem statement. There is a recognition of potential misunderstandings regarding the nature of Gaussian surfaces and their relation to radiation. Some participants suggest that the problem may be poorly worded, leading to confusion about the physical setup.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for the star's radius and temperature to properly address the problem. Participants are also considering the implications of equilibrium conditions, which are not explicitly stated in the problem.

Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11
Homework Statement
A spherical shell with a radius of R surrounds a star with temperature T.

Find the amount of energy that the shell from the star in an hour.
Relevant Equations
[tex] P=\sigma*A*T^4 [/tex]
I don't understand how this can be solved.

The official solution was:

F=\sigma*T^4

E=F*4\pi R^2*60*60

This doesn't make sense to me, as it seems to imply that the energy that the black body radiates depends on the radius of the shell. For a very large shell the body will reflect "infinity" energy.

Can someone please explain this?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If a body emits a total of 100 Joules per second and you enclose it completely with a shell, 100 Joules per second will pass through the entire shell no matter how large the shell is.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Eitan Levy
kuruman said:
If a body emits a total of 100 Joules per second and you enclose it completely with a shell, 100 Joules per second will pass through the entire shell no matter how large the shell is.

That's what I figured! Is the solution wrong?
 
You should previously know the star's radius.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27
Gordianus said:
You should previously know the star's radius.
The radius R of the surrounding shell is given. That ought to be enough.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: hmmm27
But at equilibrium the temperature of the shell is not the temperature of the star. That is the point and the OP is correct.
 
hutchphd said:
But at equilibrium the temperature of the shell is not the temperature of the star. That is the point and the OP is correct.
True, but there is no mention of equilibrium in the statement of the problem. My interpretation is that the shell is something like a Gaussian surface and not a material object.
 
Gaussian surfaces do not radiate. The ##\sigma T^4## is for the surface that radiates and is emitted power per area. You are making the same mistake as the Prof I fear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
Perhaps the homework has a wording problem. I think the sphere of radius R is a sort of Gaussian surface that encloses the star (that radiates to the 2.7 K background). Thus, we should know the star's radius (call it a)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #10
You need to know the the temperature of some physical object of known radius. The problem as stated is not correctly solved.
No hand waving required. As pointed out astutely by the OP this leads to infinite power Dyson spheres.
 
  • #11
hutchphd said:
Gaussian surfaces do not radiate. The ##\sigma T^4## is for the surface that radiates and is emitted power per area. You are making the same mistake as the Prof I fear.
You fear correctly. Goes to show that I shouldn't be trying to do problems in my head.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K