Black hole can regard as most efficency mass-energy convecter?

  • Thread starter Thread starter magnetar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black hole Hole
magnetar
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
Black hole can regard as most efficency mass-energy converter?

With black hole and hawking radiation's help, i come up with an idea to convert my apple completely into pure energy without another antimatter apple:biggrin:

I throw my apple into a black hole , eventually my apple will convert into hawking radiation—pure energy(particle and antiparticle will annihilate each other into photons).

The net result is my apple completely convert into pure energy!:-p
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The energy you get out of Hawking radiation is hardly 'pure' since it's pretty much as useless energy as you can find. For example, a human can easily use a fraction of the energy stored in an apple by eating it, but there's absolutely no way to build a machine which could utilize ANY energy stored in extremely cold thermal radiation.
 
And the correct word is "convert", not "convect".
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top