I Black Hole Fermion Count

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter .Scott
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
A recent paper from the University of Portsmouth explores the implications of fermions within a black hole's event horizon, particularly regarding their behavior during black hole evaporation. The discussion raises questions about whether the total number of fermions is preserved as a black hole evaporates, noting that current understanding suggests that not all fermions will re-emerge. It is highlighted that while conservation laws apply, there is no specific law for the conservation of fermions, meaning they could be transformed into other particles, such as bosons. The conversation reflects on the complexities of black hole physics and the challenges in understanding particle behavior in extreme conditions. Overall, the topic underscores the ongoing mysteries surrounding black hole evaporation and particle conservation.
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,818
Reaction score
1,874
TL;DR
Researchers at UK's University of Portsmouth consider the effects of Pauli Exclusion on fermions in a black hole.
A recent paper ( PhyRevD, arxiv, asxiv pdf ) from researchers at UK's University of Portsmouth entitled "Gravitational Bounce from the Quantum Exclusion Principle" considers the effect of any fermions (including quarks and electrons) contained within the event horizon of a black hole.

The discussion is interesting because it can match up with conditions observed in our universe.

But it also makes me wonder how a fermion count can be maintained in the interior of a black hole without also being reflected on its surface.
When a black hole eventually evaporates, would the total number of fermions be preserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
.Scott said:
When a black hole eventually evaporates, would the total number of fermions be preserved?
I don't think we know enough about black hole evaporation to give a firm answer to this question.

As best I understand current models, dumping a bunch of fermions (and no antifermions) into a black hole does not mean the same number of fermions will eventually come out. The expectation is that many fewer fermions will come out (quite possibly zero), because the vast majority of the radiation from the evaporation of the hole will be photons.

As far as I know, conservation laws are not violated by black hole evaporation, so, for example, if you dump a bunch of charged fermions into a black hole, the same charge has to come back out somehow. But I don't think there is any general law of "conservation of fermions". The charge might come out as charged bosons.
 
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
309
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
4K