I Black Hole Fermion Count

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter .Scott
  • Start date Start date
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,750
Reaction score
1,832
TL;DR Summary
Researchers at UK's University of Portsmouth consider the effects of Pauli Exclusion on fermions in a black hole.
A recent paper ( PhyRevD, arxiv, asxiv pdf ) from researchers at UK's University of Portsmouth entitled "Gravitational Bounce from the Quantum Exclusion Principle" considers the effect of any fermions (including quarks and electrons) contained within the event horizon of a black hole.

The discussion is interesting because it can match up with conditions observed in our universe.

But it also makes me wonder how a fermion count can be maintained in the interior of a black hole without also being reflected on its surface.
When a black hole eventually evaporates, would the total number of fermions be preserved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
.Scott said:
When a black hole eventually evaporates, would the total number of fermions be preserved?
I don't think we know enough about black hole evaporation to give a firm answer to this question.

As best I understand current models, dumping a bunch of fermions (and no antifermions) into a black hole does not mean the same number of fermions will eventually come out. The expectation is that many fewer fermions will come out (quite possibly zero), because the vast majority of the radiation from the evaporation of the hole will be photons.

As far as I know, conservation laws are not violated by black hole evaporation, so, for example, if you dump a bunch of charged fermions into a black hole, the same charge has to come back out somehow. But I don't think there is any general law of "conservation of fermions". The charge might come out as charged bosons.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top