I Black Hole Information path described in new article

Click For Summary
A recent paper titled "Quantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holes" discusses a new mechanism for information retention at black holes' event horizons. It suggests that information is encoded in Hawking radiation through quantum gravitational corrections to the exterior metric, referred to as "quantum hair." The study calculates how these corrections affect the emission amplitude of Hawking particles. This research provides insights into how information escapes black holes, linking the quantum state of the black hole to the quantum state of its exterior. The findings contribute to the ongoing dialogue between quantum physics and general relativity.
.Scott
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,822
Reaction score
1,876
TL;DR
A paper appears to describe an event horizon mechanism for holding information and encoding it in the Hawking radiation.
I'm posting this in "Quantum Physics" although it is just as much "General Relativity".

A paper entitled "Quantum gravitational corrections to particle creation by black holes" was published in
Science Direct earlier this month.
It appears to provide an event horizon mechanism for holding information and encoding it in the Hawking radiation.
The abstract:
We calculate quantum gravitational corrections to the amplitude for the emission of a Hawking particle by a black hole. We show explicitly how the amplitudes depend on quantum corrections to the exterior metric (quantum hair). This reveals the mechanism by which information escapes the black hole. The quantum state of the black hole is reflected in the quantum state of the exterior metric, which in turn influences the emission of Hawking quanta.
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes Demystifier

Thread 'Angular Momentum Vector and Its Magnitude'

For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Will all objects in the Universe transform into black holes through quantum tunneling?
Replies
7
Views
2K
I Black Hole Fermion Count
Replies
1
Views
910
I Entangled particles in black hole decay?
Replies
11
Views
2K
I Entanglement may reveal more about black holes? ...Even micro ones!
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Do black holes destroy quantum states?
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Black Hole Fire Walls, Brick Walls, and the Casimir Effect
Replies
6
Views
2K
B How to shorten this speech about BH?
Replies
28
Views
4K
I Black Hole Singularity: Discussing Quantum Theories
Replies
11
Views
2K
I The evaporation of charged black holes
Replies
8
Views
3K
I Black hole singularity vs. quantum mechanics
Replies
6
Views
3K