Black Holes & Time: How Do We Observe Movement?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Jacob Gable
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black holes Holes Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes, particularly focusing on how time behaves near them, the observation of matter falling into black holes, and the implications of theories like the holographic principle. Participants explore concepts related to time dilation, movement of black holes, and the information paradox associated with black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that time appears to slow down as one approaches a black hole, but this is a misconception that is clarified by others who argue that it only looks that way to distant observers.
  • There is a claim that while matter falling into a black hole appears to slow down as it approaches the event horizon, it is still moving towards it, and observers can infer this movement.
  • Questions are raised about whether matter or energy falling into a black hole leaves information on the event horizon, referencing the holographic principle and its proponents like Leonard Susskind and Stephen Hawking.
  • Some participants express confusion about the holographic principle and its implications, indicating a lack of understanding despite acknowledging the expertise of those involved in the discussion.
  • There is a mention of misconceptions surrounding quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the behavior of electrons, with some participants challenging popular science interpretations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of time near black holes and the implications of the holographic principle. There is no consensus on these complex topics, and confusion persists regarding quantum mechanics and its interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Some statements reflect common misconceptions in popular science, and there are unresolved questions about the nature of information retention at black holes and the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics.

Jacob Gable
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm not a physicist so I am very igorant on this subject. From I know time gets slower and slower as you approach a black hole and an outside observer would never actually see matter being gobbled up. But I have read about stars get observed getting eaten away. How is this possible? And how do black holes move? If time essentially stops in one how do we observe it move in space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
You are experiencing a very common misconception brought about by poor (and even fallacious) descriptions in pop-sci presentations.

Jacob Gable said:
I'm not a physicist so I am very igorant on this subject. From I know time gets slower and slower as you approach a black hole
No, it does not. It just looks that way to a distant observer.
and an outside observer would never actually see matter being gobbled up.
Correct.

But I have read about stars get observed getting eaten away. How is this possible?
The matter being eaten appears to slow down as it approaches the Event Horizon but we see it headed that way and infer correctly that despite how it looks to us, it is in fact falling into the Event Horizon.

And how do black holes move?
just like everything else in the universe moves.
If time essentially stops in one how do we observe it move in space?
Since time does NOT slow down, there's no issue.
 
Might I ask whether its true that matter or energy falling into a black hole always leaves information on the event horizon?

(Talk about Big Brother surveillance...)
 
RelativeRelativity said:
Might I ask whether its true that matter or energy falling into a black hole always leaves information on the event horizon?

(Talk about Big Brother surveillance...)
That's what Leonard Susskind believes and finally convinced Stephen Hawking of (Google "The Holographic Principle"). Personally, I just don't get the holographic principle at all but I do concede that those guys know more than I do.

Susskind wrote a book about it "The Black Hole War: My Battle with Stephen Hawking to Make the World Safe for Quantum Mechanics"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RelativeRelativity
Thank you, I'm a little familiar. If I believe an electron can be everywhere at once I'm at the mercy of experts from there on lol
 
RelativeRelativity said:
Thank you, I'm a little familiar. If I believe an electron can be everywhere at once I'm at the mercy of experts from there on lol
Yes, but an electron can NOT be everywhere at once. That's another pop-sci fallacy. It can be ANYWHERE until measured, but that's a far cry from being everywhere at once.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RelativeRelativity
Thanks I hadn't planned to mention it, you get a lot thrown in when googling for research.
 
If electrons really are everywhere at once I urgently need better reading glasses.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RelativeRelativity

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K